A reader challenge
by Owen Courrèges · 05/03/2005 6:32 pmA reader offers the following challenge to prove the liberal bias of the Houston Chronicle:
I love how all of you will just dismiss the Chronicle a “liberal rag” and disparage the op/ed writers, but some of us don’t exactly see the Houston Chronicle as a bastion of liberalism.I challenge the fine folks of LST (and its readers for that matter) to count the number of editorial pieces that lean left versus the number that lean right. Let’s do this for a week and we will have an answer to how “liberal” the Chronicle really is.
Ron
First off, does Ron even read the Chronicle? Let’s list the positions of its editorial board:
- Against the Iraq War
- In favor of more environmental regulation
- Pro-light rail
- Pro-abortion
- Anti-death penalty
- In favor of gay "rights"
- Opposed to the Bush tax plan
- In favor of more social spending
- Thinks Tom DeLay is the anti-Christ
Well, that sounds pretty liberal to me! But let’s take up this fellow on his challenge. Here’s today’s editorials:
Hard of hearing: Give the public equal say in issuing plant permits
- In favor of the NIMBY mentality. Their position restrains industrial development, supposedly for environmental reasons. A liberal staff editorial.
Real leader: Fox places democratic legacy above party’s passion
- A staff editorial praising Mexican President Victinte Fox for halting prosecution of Mexico City’s left-of-center mayor. Pretty liberal.
Another Voice: Arnold and the immigrants
- An LA Times editorial condemning Governor Schwarzenegger for praising the "Minutemen." Very liberal.
U.S. to blame for erosion of nonproliferation treaty
- An op-ed from Jimmy Carter blaming the US in foreign policy matters. It doesn’t get more liberal than the peanut farming peacenik.
Brooks: Frist blew the chance to make a deal, avert disaster
- A David Brooks column condemning the actions of Republican House Speaker Bill Frist. Brooks is middle-of-the-road, but the editorial appeals to liberals.
Dionne: Bush playing Social Security hand with stacked deck
- E.J. Dionne condemns the Bush Social Security plan. Liberal.
That’s it. If anybody wants me to do this all week, that’s fine. But I think the point is made. The Chronicle may run some conservative op-eds and columns (and occasionally even a conservative staff editorial) but these are few and far between. The paper is overwhelmingly liberal.
Filed Under Uncategorized ·







Owen, Excellent answer.
I enjoy this website and check it daily. It calls the Houston Chronicle what it is: a liberal rag. Do any of the editors ever read Texas Monthly? They are quite blue for a state as red as this! They attack a different conservative (almost always a Republican) in each issue. If I had more time I’d start my own website taking on Texas Monthly. I’d LOVE to hear Lone Star Times’ thoughts on TM’s articles. Anyone at LST want to take them on?
Cheyney Ashcraft
Spring, TX
I live out in east Texas and I used to read the Chron every day as we lack a real newspaper here. But when they decided to ban classified ads for firearms I stopped and, aside from following an occasional link to a story on the internet, haven’t read it since.
I believe you have a slight error in your views of the Comical…err…Chronicle’s editorial board. You state they are in favor of more environmental regulation. Since much of what the enviro wackos use is junk science, and not backed by tangible facts, perhaps it should be called environmental religion.