Top
Comments
4 Responses to “DeLay burns, Casey squirms”
  1. Robert on October 5th, 2005 at 2:44 pm

    In the long run, the Ronnie Earle debacle will be seen as the Dan Rathergate of Earle’s career. In the past we didn’t have the internet to set the record straight. People got one-sided information from the liberal media that was not truthful and was biased. Not anymore!!!! Both men are at retirement age, in Mr. Rather’s case the court of public opinion did him in. In Mr. Earle’s case it will have to be by the ballot box unless the people of Austin and Travis county enjoy being laughed at by the rest of the country for electing such an incompetent person like Ronnie Earle. Only time will tell.

  2. Don Hooks on October 5th, 2005 at 2:56 pm

    As liberal as Austin and Travis County are I don’t think it will be at the ballot box.

  3. publius on October 5th, 2005 at 10:56 pm

    Earle had to shop his indictments three times. The first grand jury refused to indict. Try again. Second grand jury indicted (hurrah!), but then it was discovered it indicted Delay under a 1993 law for acts in 1992. (oh, boohoo!). Try again. Third time is the charm. A new grand jury was impaneled and within 4 hours Earle had his brand new and improved indictment. The cynical among you may question why it took only 4 hours to get an indictment in what will probably be a complex case both as to fact as well as law, but that is because you lack a proper appreciation of what public service really is all about.

  4. publius on October 6th, 2005 at 1:44 pm

    I misstated the dates as 1993/1992. It was actually 2003/2002. I apologize for the error, but the point is that Earle’s original indictment was fatally flawed. Subsequent events make it appear he is shopping grand juries and charges in order to get at Delay.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom