TAC flack attacks; LST whacks back
by David Benzion · 10/07/2005 11:37 amIt must be nice to win a Pulitzer or Oscar or Emmy.
But I doubt that any of those professional awards could equal the thrill I got upon realizing just how badly LST, KSEV and you– our readers and listeners– have managed to piss-off the Texas Association of Counties in general, and their chief public relations flack Jim Lewis in particular.
All excerpted text courtesy the Sept/Oct ‘05 edition of TAC’s County Magazine, page 49 (pdf); emphasis in bold added by LST.
HEADLINE: "Wednesday Morning Showdown in Montgomery County", by Jim Lewis
On the surface, it appeared to be a political public relations disaster in the making.
In the backyard of the libertarian radio station that has harped for years on the need for lowered appraisal caps, a Saturday morning Houston Chronicle article laid out how Montgomery County Commissioners Court, flush with $10 million in increased revenues, was about to adopt the same tax rate as the year before. And, the paper noted, "With the tax rate remaining the same, a public hearing will not be necessary."
Although I’m guessing you meant it as a slur, it’s nice to have my strong libertarian streak finally recognized.
Also, I just love the use of the word "harped"– me detects an "edge" to this piece one does not typically find in trade-association publications.
In an area of the state hyper-sensitive about "appraisal creep," this scenario looked like red meat for the hungry anti-government dogs at KSEV radio in Houston, in particular talk show hosts Ed Hendee (mornings) and Dan Patrick (afternoons). Sure enough, the next day a Weblog "published" by Patrick posted a highly satiric criticism of County Judge Alan Sadler’s comments in the paper:
"Red Meat for the Hungry Anti-Government Dogs at KSEV Radio".
Dude– that is so going on our advertising solicitation materials.
A little lame not to specifically name LoneStarTimes.com as the "weblog", but I’ll let it slide this once.
"In a display of Heavenly generosity unparalleled since the Israelites wandered Sinai subsisting only on manna, God Almighty himself has seen fit to open up the sky above Montgomery County Texas and pour almost $10 million dollars into government coffers for local commissioners to spend on a bunch of new stuff that is completely FREE and costs taxpayers nothing and you have nothing to complain about at all!!!"
Awesome.
And as soon as Hendee got on the air Monday morning, lambasting the county and its officials was high hilarity for the station’s fans on their rides to work. The way to fix the problem, he intoned, was for anyone in earshot to start calling Sadler and the commissioners.
That’s a favorite tactic of the Houston station – flood public officials with phone calls until someone cries "uncle." When lowering appraisal caps was before the Legislature last spring, Hendee issued marching orders for Houston-area callers to flood the phone lines of Dallas area legislators, threatening to beat them at the polls next year.
In other words, "mind-numbed robots". So very 1990.
In the Houston-area, most elected officials – both state and local – know better than to challenge the anti-government duo on the air – it’s virtually impossible to out-talk the professional BSers, since they control the microphone.
Holy freaking crap! He wrote "BSers" in the official trade publication of the Texas Association of Counties! That’s almost cussing!
But Judge Sadler took a bold step – he invited the station to set up their equipment at the county administration building and broadcast a live discussion of the county’s finances.
Bold? The Texas Association of Counties believes that a willingess to explain oneself to the public requires boldness?
When Hendee showed up Wednesday morning, it didn’t hurt that Sadler told him right off the bat that he is an advocate of both appraisal and revenue caps. Because of appraisal increases and the station’s browbeating, virtually all public officials in the Houston area are on board supporting the caps. But on the topic of the county’s budget, Sadler stood his ground.
Wait a minute … I thought we were "harping" … when did we switch to "browbeating" … why doesn’t anyone tell me these things?!?!
The next part of the article is basically pro-TAC propoganda, but in the interest of fairness, I thought it ought to be included in full. You all can no doubt offer your own thoughts in comments.
"On the other hand, I still have to deal with the realities of the budget and accomplish what the voters have mandated that I do," the judge said.
First, he noted, supporters of library services in the largely unincorporated county had petitioned the court to hold a 2003 bond election to build three new libraries – it passed, costing the county $1.075 million in new salaries.
And then the judge began detailing costs associated with providing urban-type services in one of the fastest growing counties in the nation – four bond elections in recent years meant hundreds of millions of dollars in roads as well new jail beds and a civic center had to be built. Another bond election was on the ballot in September.
Then he explained further details of the county’s budget needs – how they finally gave in to district attorney’s pleas to create a new grand jury after three years of asking, how they have to maintain a healthy reserve to preserve their bond rating, how they built the jail because they had 900 inmates for 575 beds and on and on.
Hendee couldn’t challenge those facts, so he fell back on a frequent line of attack – "So what do you say to those taxpayers who are hit with a tax increase that’s going up faster than their paychecks?"
Um, that isn’t a "line of attack" … it is just a good point. Cause even if you do want to buy into every single one of Sadler’s claims, that doesn’t solve the appraisal creep– sorry, "creep"– problem, does it?
After clarifying that most of the county’s $10 million increase in tax collections was the result of new construction, and only two percent due to valuation increases, Sadler made clear the choice the county faced.
"Ed, I wish I had a magic bullet for you, but I don’t. I guess we could stop having deputies patrol as much. I guess we could cut court dates back to four days a week. There are cuts we could make like that," he said. "And in fact if there are appraisal and revenue caps in the future, we will be making tough cuts along those lines."
And now you know– the only thing preventing anarchy and chaos from spreading across Montgomery County is an appraisal cap of no less than 10%.
With time out for commercials, Hendee continued to press Sadler for an hour and a half and by the end of the show, the two who began as adversaries actually appeared to be getting along okay. Instead of a browbeating, it turned into an education session about the county’s budget needs. On the whole, Hendee was unable to crack the judge’s case.
A couple of days later, Assessor-Collector J. R. Moore, who sat with Sadler during the discussion and added his two cents briefly on the radio, said the reaction around the county was quite positive. "The judge got the word out about what’s going on here and everyone seemed better informed" because of the interview.
But while it appeared Hendee was somewhat satisfied when he left, on the radio the next day, he continued to grumble about one issue he was still unhappy about – the commissioners court’s planned approval of 25 percent increases in their own car allowances.
Despite the judge’s valiant stand during his radio presentation, the pressure continued.
Jeez, what is with the martyr complex?
By Friday, the blog reported that Sadler’s office had put out word he would reject the car allowance.
OK, that is starting to get annoying. It is LoneStarTimes.com.
Nevertheless, thanks Jim Lewis– you made my day. If I can help in any way when it comes time to submit this piece for consideration in the TAC-affiliated National Association of County Information Officers competition, please let me know.
It looks like you all had a wonderful time in Hawaii this past year at the awards-ceremony.
And frankly, you sound a little cranky to me– another trip to Waikiki to learn how to better communicate to the taxpaying public just how frugal Texas county government is would probably do you a world of good.
Filed Under Uncategorized ·







Very good stuff guys. This is getting fun!
Good stuff, but besides TAC members and LST and KSEV… who else is even going to see this? I don’t see any of the “regular” stations covering this at all.
All I know is that I am getting tired of hearing that the only way state/county/city government can function is to have a guaranteed revenue increase, above and beyond what normal tax base expansion would provide for.
As far as jails go, put them in sleeping bags on the floor.
The tax revolt is coming and government officials had better watch out because they will be getting even less if they keep this up. The taxpaying public has just about had enough of their rhetoric. It has always been the scare tactic of government officials who, when desparate, always claim that any cuts in taxes will result in cuts in basic service like police and fire as if those were the only two budget items they have. I’ll bet if they had to earn those tax dollars they would act more responsible but since it is easier to tax and take, why change your spending habits.
What has the Montgomery Co. magic bullet got to do with deputies, are the libraries staffed with patrolling deputies? First, sweep out incumbents, and then enact reform legislation, repeat process until mission accomplished! Sooner or later they will get the message.
GRRRR… more red meat
That is precisely why we are here. Tell your friends.
Squawkbox
Moderator and really nice guy
All taxpayers can expect a real fight. We need to go after all incumbents with a fever of expulsion from office. Hopefully Dan won’t go to soft on us as he is already starting to get politically correct with his words. Thanks to Paulette who last Friday point out to him that he was trying to qualify everything which he said he wasn’t but he is getting a little weak in the loafers with his words about his opponents in the election. That Kilinham or what ever his name to replace staples - Texas senator is from Conroe is a tax and spend Democratic Liberal as gutless as Kay Bailey-senator and David-congressman from the area. In his first interview he sidesteped words about taxes which indicates he will go along with sadler on tax increases. Even nixon who airs sound bites on KSEV talks about everything but tax control. It is time for a battle over taxes and illegals and only those with nerve and guts need join as no prisoners or liars will be allowed to survive the next election cycle.
Interesting quote:
“On the other hand, I still have to deal with the realities of the budget and accomplish what the voters have mandated that I do,” the judge said.
I know I’m politically naive to some degree, but isn’t the voter’s mandate inclusive of reasonable appraisal increases? Isn’t that also a reality of the budget?
If servicing the bond debt is the problem why doesn’t Montgomery county STOP PUTTING BOND ELECTIONS ON THE BALLOT UNTIL YOU CAN AFFORD THEM? I’m sure all the people who live in apartments and stuff don’t mind voting for bonds, they won’t have to pay for them, at least directly, which keeps the cost invisible. When you have to rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on the support of Paul.
Well, I for one hate being robbed!!!
I just don’t get what they don’t understand.
New or expanded county services are almost always due to an increase in population. If the population increases, so does the tax revenue. So there is no reason to raise taxes higher than inflation. And I don’t believe anyone here or at CLOUT has a problem with appraisal values rising at the same level as inflation. (And for those in govenment who may be reading this, inflation has not been at 10% for quite some time).
In the event that the county “needs” more money to provide something to the citizens, allow the citizens to vote on it to decide whether or not they truely want it and feel its worth paying for.
“”Red Meat for the Hungry Anti-Government Dogs at KSEV Radio”.”
And LST
Woof Woof
There’s a difference between government and bureaucrats, a difference also between elected and appointed. Worse, the difference between the media and getting the whole truth in a timely fashion is entire.
The media is a special interest, controlling parts of the gov and bureaucracy. Bigger special interests control any of the above. When the media controls the people, they indirectly control elections of the gov. The gov also controls the bureaucracy. The gov gives itself and bureaucracy best pay increases and perky benefits, so many want to get in on that, any-which-way-they-can. The gov also controls the people (because the people long ago forgot they were the ones in charge).
well i for one found this to be hillarius and the fact that it is an official document is well more funny