Top
Comments
13 Responses to “TAC flack attacks; LST whacks back”
  1. DanMan on October 7th, 2005 at 7:11 am

    Very good stuff guys. This is getting fun!

  2. davewolfgang on October 7th, 2005 at 8:18 am

    Good stuff, but besides TAC members and LST and KSEV… who else is even going to see this? I don’t see any of the “regular” stations covering this at all.

  3. jimb on October 7th, 2005 at 8:43 am

    All I know is that I am getting tired of hearing that the only way state/county/city government can function is to have a guaranteed revenue increase, above and beyond what normal tax base expansion would provide for.

    As far as jails go, put them in sleeping bags on the floor.

  4. Robert on October 7th, 2005 at 8:52 am

    The tax revolt is coming and government officials had better watch out because they will be getting even less if they keep this up. The taxpaying public has just about had enough of their rhetoric. It has always been the scare tactic of government officials who, when desparate, always claim that any cuts in taxes will result in cuts in basic service like police and fire as if those were the only two budget items they have. I’ll bet if they had to earn those tax dollars they would act more responsible but since it is easier to tax and take, why change your spending habits.

  5. EX-Diver on October 7th, 2005 at 9:10 am

    What has the Montgomery Co. magic bullet got to do with deputies, are the libraries staffed with patrolling deputies? First, sweep out incumbents, and then enact reform legislation, repeat process until mission accomplished! Sooner or later they will get the message.
    GRRRR… more red meat

  6. squawkbox on October 7th, 2005 at 10:03 am

    davewolfgang Says:
    October 7th, 2005 at 8:18 am e
    Good stuff, but besides TAC members and LST and KSEV… who else is even going to see this? I don’t see any of the “regular” stations covering this at all.

    That is precisely why we are here. Tell your friends.
    Squawkbox
    Moderator and really nice guy

  7. Unfair Tax on October 7th, 2005 at 12:16 pm

    All taxpayers can expect a real fight. We need to go after all incumbents with a fever of expulsion from office. Hopefully Dan won’t go to soft on us as he is already starting to get politically correct with his words. Thanks to Paulette who last Friday point out to him that he was trying to qualify everything which he said he wasn’t but he is getting a little weak in the loafers with his words about his opponents in the election. That Kilinham or what ever his name to replace staples - Texas senator is from Conroe is a tax and spend Democratic Liberal as gutless as Kay Bailey-senator and David-congressman from the area. In his first interview he sidesteped words about taxes which indicates he will go along with sadler on tax increases. Even nixon who airs sound bites on KSEV talks about everything but tax control. It is time for a battle over taxes and illegals and only those with nerve and guts need join as no prisoners or liars will be allowed to survive the next election cycle.

  8. Mike Martin on October 7th, 2005 at 12:20 pm

    Interesting quote:

    “On the other hand, I still have to deal with the realities of the budget and accomplish what the voters have mandated that I do,” the judge said.

    I know I’m politically naive to some degree, but isn’t the voter’s mandate inclusive of reasonable appraisal increases? Isn’t that also a reality of the budget?

  9. Rorschach on October 7th, 2005 at 12:29 pm

    If servicing the bond debt is the problem why doesn’t Montgomery county STOP PUTTING BOND ELECTIONS ON THE BALLOT UNTIL YOU CAN AFFORD THEM? I’m sure all the people who live in apartments and stuff don’t mind voting for bonds, they won’t have to pay for them, at least directly, which keeps the cost invisible. When you have to rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on the support of Paul.

  10. Peter on October 7th, 2005 at 12:57 pm

    Well, I for one hate being robbed!!!

    I just don’t get what they don’t understand.

    New or expanded county services are almost always due to an increase in population. If the population increases, so does the tax revenue. So there is no reason to raise taxes higher than inflation. And I don’t believe anyone here or at CLOUT has a problem with appraisal values rising at the same level as inflation. (And for those in govenment who may be reading this, inflation has not been at 10% for quite some time).

    In the event that the county “needs” more money to provide something to the citizens, allow the citizens to vote on it to decide whether or not they truely want it and feel its worth paying for.

  11. squawkbox on October 7th, 2005 at 8:28 pm

    “”Red Meat for the Hungry Anti-Government Dogs at KSEV Radio”.”

    And LST

    Woof Woof

  12. Bear Creek on October 7th, 2005 at 9:20 pm

    There’s a difference between government and bureaucrats, a difference also between elected and appointed. Worse, the difference between the media and getting the whole truth in a timely fashion is entire.
    The media is a special interest, controlling parts of the gov and bureaucracy. Bigger special interests control any of the above. When the media controls the people, they indirectly control elections of the gov. The gov also controls the bureaucracy. The gov gives itself and bureaucracy best pay increases and perky benefits, so many want to get in on that, any-which-way-they-can. The gov also controls the people (because the people long ago forgot they were the ones in charge).

  13. kidwittehtape on October 8th, 2005 at 7:25 am

    well i for one found this to be hillarius and the fact that it is an official document is well more funny

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom