Daniel Craig will have a problem playing the new James Bond - because he hates guns.
The actor will wield 007’s famous Walther PPK in the movie Casino Royale.
But he revealed in OK! magazine: "I hate handguns. Handguns are used to shoot people and as long as they are around, people will shoot each other.
Unfortunately, that wasn’t the only stupid thing to appear in this story. You see, the reporter is also a complete moron:
Nor does the 37-year-old share Bond’s love of Martinis shaken and stirred.
Congratulations, Evening Standard. You just screwed up one of the most famous lines in cinematic history:
Shaken, not stirred.
NOT stirred! NOT STIRRED!! By the way, Bond-style martinis are good for you. Take two and call me in the morning.
13 Responses to “New 007 outs self as anti-gun weenie”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
October 25th, 2005 at 2:26 pm
Sean Connery - where are you????
October 25th, 2005 at 2:36 pm
Just another crazy liberal spouting off his mind-numbing foolishness. Look, dude, if you don’t believe in guns, then why are taking the role of James Bond? It can’t be for the MONEY, can it? More liberal hypocrisy.
Do any of the readers here recall the movie that came out last year called “A day without a Mexican?” It was supposed to be a comedy about what society would do if all the Mexicans left.
Well, I propose a movie called “A Day Without A Liberal.” Can you imagine an entire day without having to hear some ridiculous liberal’s opinion on things? The joy!
I can only dream….
October 25th, 2005 at 2:51 pm
Shake it, stir it, reload and fire again.
October 25th, 2005 at 2:53 pm
Actually, Roger Moore ain’t too fond of handguns, either. For whatever it’s worth.
October 25th, 2005 at 4:40 pm
There is only one James Bond…the Sexiest Man in the World…Sir Sean. Period.
October 25th, 2005 at 5:01 pm
Boxie, I hear you. It took me years to appreciate it having grown up on Moore’s 007. Plus, Sean Connery is proof men can lose their hair and get all crinkly around the eyes and STILL be sexy. (There’s hope for you guys yet!)
Though Brosnan is a hot close second, and I’m miffed he was shown the door.
October 25th, 2005 at 5:50 pm
Sean Connery, Yul Brenner, Gerald McRaney…all bald…all sexier than all get out.
October 25th, 2005 at 7:33 pm
I grew up with Roger Moore as 007. It always amazed me how 20 guys with machine guns could be shooting at Bond and never hit him but he could shoot a guy 200 feet up on a catwalk and hit him with that Walther PPK. Movie magic I guess.
I bet one day there will be a gay Bond. Not that there is anything wrong with that.
October 25th, 2005 at 7:44 pm
Repeat after me:
If guns are responsible for murder, pencils are responsible for misspelling.
October 25th, 2005 at 10:20 pm
#9 I bet that a pencil has been responsible for a murder before, too. It ain’t outside the realm of possibility.
October 25th, 2005 at 10:25 pm
#9,
And forks are responsible for obesity.
October 26th, 2005 at 7:17 am
To quote the honorable John Witherspoon from that cinematic classic “Friday” (when confronting his son who has brandished a handgun):
“you kids these days are wussified. Everyone is scared to take an a–whooping. Back in my day all we needed were these (holding up his fists). You win some, you lose some, but you live to fight another day, you live. You think a gun makes you a man? This (pointing to his brain) is what makes you a man”.
That’s as deep as it gets.
January 14th, 2006 at 10:55 pm
I agree that the only true bond was Sean. Roger would be second although he dosen’t like guns. If they have anymore tree huggin’ hippies as bond, I may loose interest in seeing anymore bond movies. And I really hope they don’t have any gay bonds ever. He is suppose to be a ladie’s man not a qweer.