Top
Comments
43 Responses to “The future?”
  1. CRK on February 2nd, 2006 at 12:39 pm

    She really is such an attractive darling of a person doncha think? I can’t imagine why Bill doesn’t stay home more?

  2. Doch4 on February 2nd, 2006 at 12:45 pm

    The Article is titled, “The Future”, and it is dated February 2, 2006.

    I think the author made a mistake on the date, it should have been dated October 31, 2006 and titled
    “The Future of Halloween!”

    Buy your DNC masks early, they are going fast !

  3. bweldon on February 2nd, 2006 at 12:48 pm

    No actually some one gave her a lemonhead and she is commenting on how sour it is.

    Really what I am encouraged by is Lynn Swann trying to get the Republican Nomination for Gov of Pennsylvania. and his campaign theme is “Democratic Party has ‘taken the African-American vote for granted.’”

    more details here.
    http://www.pennlive.com/newsflash/pa/index.ssf?/base/news-34/1138757345219320.xml&storylist=penn

  4. Robert on February 2nd, 2006 at 12:54 pm

    This is just the kind of picture I was hoping for. Here’s my “Top Ten” list of captions (and there are obviously more out there):

    1) Just don’t call me Mrs. Bill Clinton!!!

    2) Now, whose Bill sleeping with????

    3) No!!! I’m not a lesbian!!!!

    4) This is my imitation of a winner.

    5) We don’t need no stinkin’ plan. We’ll just keep criticizing them.

    6) Damn it!!! I’m a moderate!!!

    7) No, Bill can’t be my running mate!!!!

    8) Tell Bill there’s someone else in my life and I’ll be running as Hillary Rodham.

    9) When I win the nomination, I will be smiling to the cameras like this.

    10) This is the way the groundhog looked when he came out today.

    If I can think of ten more, I’ll post them.

  5. jlo713 on February 2nd, 2006 at 12:54 pm

    lemonhead? Looks like someone gave her a lemon enema! She pathetic.

  6. Rastus on February 2nd, 2006 at 1:01 pm

    “Run Hillary Run” bumper stickers - can be placed on either the front or rear bumper. Get ‘em while they’re hot.

  7. Mountainman on February 2nd, 2006 at 1:03 pm

    Even die-hard Kool Aid drinking moonbat Dems I know are unanamous that the She Beast (my term, not theirs) will not be the Dems candidate. . . . .for once, I hope they are right. . . .

  8. LTC on February 2nd, 2006 at 1:05 pm

    will harry belafonte trash lynn swann ?

  9. tom on February 2nd, 2006 at 1:09 pm

    Could be worse - could be a picture of Cindy Sheehan.

  10. bweldon on February 2nd, 2006 at 1:21 pm

    I could really drop down to a level below drunken fraternity boy with a comment about the She Beast, lesbians, and Cindy Sheehan. But out of respect for those with weaker constitutions I will refrain.

  11. Rahman on February 2nd, 2006 at 1:23 pm

    Is this photo real or what they call it? An air brush?

  12. Maltboy! on February 2nd, 2006 at 1:27 pm

    Looks like Bill tried to stuff one stogie too many in the ol’ cigar box.

  13. headshaker on February 2nd, 2006 at 1:54 pm

    And you people bash Bill Clinton for having affairs?

    Geez! Imagine living with that!

  14. bweldon on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:00 pm

    imagine having to mate with that, it is amazing that Chelsa (sp) has turned out looking atleast reasonably good looking… Maybe her grandparents were better looking and we are only looking at a generation where the resessive genes came to the forefront.

    Hmm…. Maybe I am on to something… That would explain the behavior of that generation… it is the caveman genes that are coming out.

  15. bweldon on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:05 pm

    then there is this example of what motherhood is being shown as

    http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/02/02/yates.released.ap/index.html

  16. headshaker on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:05 pm

    #14 - she was probably “mateable” when he first met her, hence Chelsea. But later on, geez, I don’t know. Maybe if I was under a lot of influence of the alcoholic kind.

  17. bweldon on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:10 pm
  18. bweldon on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:10 pm

    actually this is the second one..

    http://www.slick.com/wildpics/hillry.html

  19. headshaker on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:14 pm

    LMAO - didn’t realize she had such a nice rack!

  20. m9777 on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:20 pm

    …this is the face I’ve been making for about a week now due to the stupid, irrevelant poll still posted on LST. Come on folks, this is a showing of “stuck on stupid.”

  21. An Observer on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:23 pm

    #16 - The bottle would definitly need to be empty.

  22. bweldon on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:25 pm

    don’t really know where else to post this but here…

    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/3630047.html

    read on your own and evaluate as to where you think this belongs.

  23. An Observer on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:26 pm

    #4 entry 11: “yes the man will have to have his spine removed”.

  24. Matt "Zilla" Bramanti on February 2nd, 2006 at 2:30 pm

    19: Yeah, that was my reaction too. Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve gotta go wash my eyes out with Lava soap and a wire brush.

  25. Sherri on February 2nd, 2006 at 3:43 pm

    personally I think she looks constipated.

  26. An Observer on February 2nd, 2006 at 3:47 pm

    # 25: Accurate description - we know she’s “full of it”.

  27. SC on February 2nd, 2006 at 3:54 pm

    #17 Is that a Monica impersonation?

  28. squawkbox on February 2nd, 2006 at 3:57 pm

    HOLY CRAP

    I leave a perfectly good discussion this morning concerning the Washington Posts cartoon and then return to see this…… Argh!

    I am going back to collecting “Profits”. This picture is the “OBSCENE” paert of this post.

  29. bweldon on February 2nd, 2006 at 4:10 pm

    new caption to the pic..

    Watch out that last one was nasty…..

  30. bweldon on February 2nd, 2006 at 4:11 pm

    Hey SC no that is what Bill fantasizes about when they are together….

  31. squawkbox on February 2nd, 2006 at 4:13 pm

    There is no doubt, Hillary is a 2 bagger.

    However your benevolent moderator is not without compassion deer readers. To wash the vision form your mind of Hillary,

    hereĀ are some cheerleaders.

  32. Obscura on February 2nd, 2006 at 4:16 pm

    Place that photo in the dictionary next to the word Succubus.

  33. mkoch on February 2nd, 2006 at 4:29 pm

    #11, is this picture airbrushed?,
    Well, yes it is!!
    They removed her horns, and then added the smile on her face….
    gag me!!

    #31, 2 bagger it is, but they better be those mesh bags from UPS or Fed-Ex, as those can’t tear open..
    be somewhere else if they fail !!

  34. publius on February 2nd, 2006 at 4:31 pm

    “A” she’s adorable, “B” she’s so beautiful, “C” she’s a cutie full of charms…

  35. headshaker on February 2nd, 2006 at 4:58 pm

    Forget the bag, this one is strictly doggie!

  36. pmartin on February 2nd, 2006 at 5:13 pm

    The only woman I’ve seen whose calves are as big as her thighs! Ugh!

  37. squawkbox on February 2nd, 2006 at 5:17 pm

    Y’all lighten up on Hillary. Permanent PMS will make anyone look like that.

  38. fasternu426 on February 2nd, 2006 at 5:52 pm

    Looks like she’s trying to pass a pine cone.

    Who was she talking to? I bet they now have two little holes in their juggular and an aversion to garlic.
    Where’s Van Helsig when you need him?

  39. Freeman on February 2nd, 2006 at 7:03 pm

    Why is it that Ronny Earl can take down Tom Delay with nothing other than his Travis County postition, yet Hillary struts arrogantly about DC (or wherever she chooses) despite the fact that solid charges should be leveled against her? Have the republican stategists completely forgotten the Peter Paul fund raiser for Hillary’s 2000 Senate campaign? You know the gala extavaganza out in Hollywood? Cher and the like performed? Am I wrong or isn’t there still an ongoing investigation? Obviously not an aggressive one. And why is it not more aggressive? The dems took a lot of pleasure in taking down Delay. Our side has forgotten how to be combatitive. The dems took Delay down over nothing. Shouldn’t Hillary be held accountable for blatant fund raising violations? Our pathetic republican stategists are still wringing their hands and worrying about protocol. Meanwhile the dems are laughing at us while planning their next victim. Get a backbone GOP.

  40. neocon on February 2nd, 2006 at 8:22 pm

    39 - Freeman,

    I couldn’t say it better! WHEN are the Republicans going to grow some? They have been given every opportunity. Hell, the Dims fling it in their faces, yet the pubbies don’t have the b*&ls to use what they have been given! Disgracful! Where’s Newt when you need him?

  41. Boxie0406 on February 2nd, 2006 at 10:38 pm

    Stop it! You are scaring me!! I have kids in this house! Couldn’t you have found one less scarey, for instance: Freddie Kruger?

  42. Tom R on February 3rd, 2006 at 9:41 am

    It’s hard to believe the MSM let that one slip through. Heads will roll over it, I’m sure. Looks like someone just told her about another one of Bill’s bimbo eruptions down in Rio…

  43. Darlene M. Crilley on February 5th, 2006 at 12:25 pm

    That fate should NEVER befall us. She is a foul-mouthed,screaming,vicious,lying,conniving embarrassment to us all.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom