Top
Comments
28 Responses to “Chron issues another badly written editorial”
  1. KRAUT on June 22nd, 2006 at 2:56 am

    If any one of you fine people at LST knows about the funeral service for Pfc. Menchaca and the route the procession will take, will you please post this info here at LST? Providing that the family will allow us to pay our respects. We are deeply in debt to our Soldiers and their families.

  2. Matt "Zilla" Bramanti on June 22nd, 2006 at 4:23 am

    According to the Chronicle, the funeral will be held at “Guadalupe Catholic Church” in Brownsville.

    Predictably, the Chron screwed that up, too. There is no Guadalupe Catholic Church. There’s Our Lady of Guadalupe, and there’s Blessed Juan Diego de Guadalupe.

    According to the Brownsville Herald, the family attends Our Lady of Guadalupe, so I’m guessing that’s where the funeral will be.

  3. headshaker on June 22nd, 2006 at 5:32 am

    Not sure what part of “we should question the government to make sure our troops have the best protections, weapons, etc.” that you have a problem with.

    The government is responsible for those things.

    You wonder why I shake my head™

  4. Matt "Zilla" Bramanti on June 22nd, 2006 at 5:41 am

    Shakey, that’s a straw man. I commented on the numerous errors in the editorial.

    Here’s an example to illustrate what you’re doing:

    Let’s say I see some knucklehead spraypainting “Tha sky iz bloo” on a brick wall. I walk by and comment that the guy shouldn’t be tagging walls, and he ought to learn how to write properly.

    Then you say, “I’m not sure what part of ‘The sky is blue’ you have a problem with.”

  5. headshaker on June 22nd, 2006 at 5:45 am

    Matt, OK I understand what you’re saying.

    So you agree with that part then, right?

  6. headshaker on June 22nd, 2006 at 5:48 am

    Hey, put up the Open Comments! I’m ready!

  7. The Dude on June 22nd, 2006 at 7:23 am

    The first two examples here don’t bother me nearly as much as the third does.

    “Gunman” should be gunmen, but I can attribute that to hastiness or poor/lack of review before printing.

    2,023 dead could simply be the number from a different source or just plain laziness in fact checking.

    So we have one example of ineptitude and one example of laziness. Those are both bad, but not nearly as bad as actively quoting someone out of context to make your point. That took effort and, dare I say it, malice to accomplish.

    TWWIHRTPS1993™

    BTW, I agree in principle with “we should question the government to make sure our troops have the best protections, weapons, etc.”. But in the editorial, the implication is that the government has done a lousy job of that. I don’t agree with that.

    Certainly it hasn’t been perfect, but I’ve noticed that even with the greatest things I’ve done in life, I can always look back and see what I could have done better. I always try to bear that in mind before I make judgements about what other people should or could have done differently.

  8. navymom on June 22nd, 2006 at 8:16 am

    What an embarrassment to our city.

  9. rj on June 22nd, 2006 at 8:18 am

    the media answers to no one. They aren’t concerned with making a profit. If they only reported half the truth, their financial report would never in the red.
    Their only mission in life is to assist the liberial left’s constant attack on American values and culture.
    The news media, printed/network is nothing more than an arm of the communist party and now an ally to Islamic radicals . Fox being the exception.
    rj

  10. GlenSam on June 22nd, 2006 at 8:39 am

    #7,

    “…the implication is that the government has done a lousy job of that. I don’t agree with that.”

    Hmm, I wonder how much you’d agree with that “implication” if YOU were an ill-equipped US soldier, or had an offspring or spouse in Iraq.

    Check out the following links
    Desperate soldiers attach homemade armor
    http://detnews.com/2004/project/0407/13/a06-209336.htm

    Ill-equipped soldiers use excess force http://www.washtimes.com/national/20050727-115941-2568r.htm

    Miss. soldier calls home, cites safety concerns http://clarionledger.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041015/NEWS01/410150366/1002

    “Certainly it hasn’t been perfect, but I’ve noticed that even with the greatest things I’ve done in life, I can always look back and see what I could have done better. I always try to bear that in mind before I make judgements about what other people should or could have done differently.”

    Oh, please…make judgments already (that’s “judgments”, not “judgements”) —but make INFORMED judgments before you build yourself up while sitting there contemplating “the greatest things [you’ve] done in life”.

    People who boast inappropriately by making (comparative) judgments are the worst of ALL judges.

  11. bweldon on June 22nd, 2006 at 8:54 am

    Man what was a commentary on the poor job that the comicle does has turned into English class.

  12. Smacktle on June 22nd, 2006 at 9:19 am

    When are Benzion and Zilla gonna do a hostile takeover for the Comical?

  13. The Dude on June 22nd, 2006 at 9:21 am

    GlenSam,

    Hmm, I wonder how much you’d agree with that “implication” if YOU were an ill-equipped US soldier, or had an offspring or spouse in Iraq.

    Classic example of the “chickenhawk” argument.

    While I don’t have an offspring or spouse in Iraq, I do have family over there. I still disagree with the implication. Do I think that things are perfect in Iraq? Absolutely not, but has a war ever been waged where things are perfect? I’ve never personally done anything perfect, so I don’t expect it of our government in something as large-scale as a war.

    I wasn’t building myself up at all in my comment. My point was quite the opposite. How you took my #7 to be boasting is beyond me.

  14. Lizzie on June 22nd, 2006 at 9:22 am

    I know this is OT, but then it’s the Chron….yesterday the Walmart on 249 in Tomball was completely blocked off with crime scene tape, lots of police officers, etc. Even the side street was blocked off. There are rumors flying about someone tossing hand grenades into the parking lot.

    Does anyone have police connections that they could check this out with?

    There was nothing on any of the news channels, which is odd considering that a bank building was also, supposedly, involved.

  15. Smacktle on June 22nd, 2006 at 9:58 am

    #15 The Dude

    Your arrogant and everybody knows it. How dare you get your spelling/ english wrong on a blog for godsakes. Don’t you know we are grading this stuff?

    Long live WB!

  16. The Dude on June 22nd, 2006 at 10:16 am

    Your arrogant and everybody knows it.

    Smackie, that’s “you’re arrogant”, not “your arrogant”. I know you don’t want WB to sternly reprimand you for your poor writing skills. You’d better watch yourself, young man, or you’re headed for study hall.

  17. malcolm on June 22nd, 2006 at 10:50 am

    Smackie/Dude:
    What’s the difference between everybody and everyone?

    Does youse knows?

  18. The Dude on June 22nd, 2006 at 10:54 am

    Malcolm,

    I’ll bite, what’s the difference?

    I’za dunno.

  19. The Dude on June 22nd, 2006 at 11:24 am

    Hey Malcolm,

    To the best of my knowledge, there is no difference between everyone/everybody, someone/somebody and anyone/anybody. At least not as far as any rules of grammar or usage are concerned.

    If I’m wrong on this, someone please correct me. The real difference is that “someone” sounds more sophisticated than “somebody.” The same applies for “anyone” and “everyone.” The versions that use “one” instead of “body” tend to sound more sophisticated. But also, I think the “body” versions sound more intimate and personable. Friendly and down to earth. So that would be a matter of the context in which you’re using the word.

    If you’re speaking at a dinner party, you might want to use “someone” almost exclusively. If you’re simply with an intimate gathering of close friends, using “somebody” might reinforce the atmosphere.

    Who says?

    http://www.antimoon.com/forum/2003/1583.htm

  20. fink1 on June 22nd, 2006 at 11:31 am

    There are several things we need to remember about the press:

    1) At the time the First Amendment was being debated and voted upon, the many competing newspapers were largely OWNED by the political parties. There was no pretense of objectivity. (That arose after William Randolph Hearst promoted the war with Spain.)The things written by the early U.S. papers about Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, etc. were far worse than anyone in MSM has written/said about Bush or Kerry.

    2) The relatively few people who could read in 1800 were steeped in history and the Bible, the best sources of critical thinking skills.

    3) While the media today are far more diverse, the political balance is asymetrical: The MSM is dominated by particularly greedy corporations which believe in flash and trash and let the liberal self-haters and folks who celebrate dysfunction run the news side.

    The conservatives have the upper hand on the Web in thoughtful commentary. But, in general, the conservative sites do not use video and pictures as well as the liberals.

    4) Critical thinking skills are lacking today, partly, maybe largely, because students do not read the “dead, white European males” who formed and built Western civilization.

    The problem is multi-faceted. Bias is less of an issue than the lack of critical thinking skills needed to recognize illogical and/or biased stories. If we improve critical thinking skills, the bias will be less of a threat.

    If we expect the media to operate without bias, we’re foolish because: 1) It won’t happen 2) We’ll be relying on someone else to control or correct the problem.

    Want to have a direct impact yourself? Read good history and the Bible (even if you don’t believe in God) and demand your kids read good history and the Bible.

    Otherwise, just sit back and whine about the culture and leave your kids unable to survive the cesspool.

  21. vlou on June 22nd, 2006 at 12:06 pm

    Dust off that old Webster’s collegiate dictionary and thesaurus!

  22. fasternu426 on June 22nd, 2006 at 12:13 pm

    The Magnolia Pycaune-Tribune-Herald-Globe-Gazette-Potpourri is more accurate. These posts come way too often. Maybe it would be easier to post:

    “Chronicle gets one right.” “Chronicle writer completes sentence without overtly inserting bias or misspelling, or misquoting”.

    Or is that too much to ask for from a newspaper in a city this size?

    We don’t need no education…..

  23. Smacktle on June 22nd, 2006 at 12:24 pm

    We don’t need no thought patrol…

  24. Smacktle on June 22nd, 2006 at 12:26 pm

    No dark sarcasm in the classroom
    Teachers leave them kids alone
    Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone!
    All in all it’s just another brick in the wall.
    All in all you’re just another brick in the wall.

    We don’t need no education
    We dont need no thought control
    No dark sarcasm in the classroom
    Teachers leave them kids alone
    Hey! Teachers! Leave them kids alone!
    All in all it’s just another brick in the wall.
    All in all you’re just another brick in the wall.

    “Wrong, Do it again!”
    “If you don’t eat yer meat, you can’t have any pudding. How can you
    have any pudding if you don’t eat yer meat?”
    “You! Yes, you behind the bikesheds, stand still laddy!”

  25. Matt "Zilla" Bramanti on June 22nd, 2006 at 12:35 pm

    Glensam, do you have any links from…oh, I dunno, the last year or so?

  26. bweldon on June 22nd, 2006 at 1:59 pm

    Smacktle,, a little pink floyd on Thursday.. that is always good.

  27. Big45Iron on June 22nd, 2006 at 3:28 pm

    The Audit Bureau of Circulations (USA) needs to have a division to grade newspapers and magazine content for quality of spelling, diction, punctuation, and syntax. Wouldn’t today’s liberal editors love that?

  28. mattsbrother on June 24th, 2006 at 12:50 am

    its funny because tom tucker is the news anchor on family guy.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom