In the past, I’ve been critical of Chronicle reader representative James T. Campbell, so I think it’s only fair to compliment the guy for his recent candor.

As of late, Campbell’s posts on his About:Chron blog have become more and more frequent, and he’s been more open about discussing the inner workings of our beloved hometown rag. Take a look at this exchange between Campbell and blogHouston’s Kevin Whited.

Whited: Do you know any other major newspaper that has a bureau chief doing double-duty as a well-left-of-center editorialist on Sundays?

Campbell: As to Clay Robison’s dual roles, I’ve stated publicly and to the editor, that he should be doing one or the other, but not both. So, I agree with you.

Whited: I’m glad we’re in agreement. Since he is still doing both, there must be a reason. What was the editor’s response to you?

Campbell: It was more a non-response than a definitive one that obviously has not resulted in the necessary action of reducing Clay’s role to either bureau chief or Austin columnist.

It’s not the whole story, but it indicates Campbell’s willingness to stand up for the interests of the reader, even when they’re in opposition to the whims of Editor Jeff Cohen.

I especially like the part where Campbell says he owes me lunch.