Must Kill Bush
by The Panda Man · 08/31/2006 10:50 amFor all of those Americans and Europeans who think President Bush is “the world’s greatest terrorist” or the biggest threat to democracy in the world today, a new UK TV movie is coming out you won’t want to miss.
President Bush ‘assassinated’ in new TV docudrama
This is the dramatic moment when President George Bush is gunned down by a sniper after a public address at a hotel, in a gripping new docudrama soon to be aired on TV.
Death of a President, shot in the style of a retrospective documentary, looks at the effect the assassination of Bush has on America in light of its ‘War on Terror’.
It’s a pointed political examination of what the War on Terror did to the American body politic.
For those who might find the work in poor taste, you just do not understand. It’s art.
“I’m sure that there will be people who will be upset by it but when you watch it you realise what a sophisticated piece of work it is.
“It’s not sensationalist, or simplistic but a very thought-provoking, powerful drama. I hope people will see that the intention behind it is good.”
The film premiers at the Toronto Film Festival in September, so be sure to make your travel reservations now.
Filed Under Uncategorized ·
Comments
35 Responses to “Must Kill Bush”Search
Our Sponsors
Poll
Loading ...LST Book Club
-
Defending Identity: Its Indispensable Role in Protecting Democracy
by Natan Sharansky -
Fear No Evil
by Natan Sharansky -
The Case For Democracy: The Power of Freedom to Overcome Tyranny and Terror
by Anatoly Shcharansky -
The Jewish State: The Struggle for Israel's Soul
by Yoram Hazony -
Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There
by David Brooks -
Snobbery: The American Version
by Joseph Epstein -
A Conflict of Visions: Idealogical Origins of Political Struggles
by Thomas Sowell
I wonder how this “artist” would feel if I did a film depicting the death of his wife or mother on September 11, 2001 and how because of their death his world was different.
Would he consider that “art”?
It is amazing how people use the term “art” to make political statements. Let’s see if any TV network is willing to show this in the US. I know the liberals will go be flocking to see it but what if it was one of their own, say Hillary for instance, that got assassinated. It’s no wonder some people don’t want their tax dollars sponsoring exhibits that are in bad taste but because we call it “art” its suppose to be okay. That’s why the Democrats are where they are now, because the ultra far left thinks it is okay.
LOL I love it. I guess it just depends on who is being killed, because the advocation of killing on this website is astounding to say the least.
You wonder why I shake my head!™
Well, for my part, I would say that there’s a huge difference between a depiction of the killing of a real non-fictional president by his real name and the advocating of killing radical islamic terrorists that I’ve been guilty of.
#3
You would love it. That is why no one can ever take anything you say seriously.
Jeremy, btw - when the Secret Service comes knocking about your title, tell them you meant this bush…
let me clarify, I’m guilty of advocating for the killing of radical islamic terrorists, not the actual killing of them.
#6
Nice. I’ll just say “Ni!” till they go away.
#7 jimb
How about Liberals, like a lot of other folks here believe?
trl3 - thanks for letting me know! Gee, maybe I’ll just go work at McDonald’s now.
No, Shakey, I don’t advocate the killing of liberals, and most of the comments made here about that very subject are more often than not dark humor.
Some would say that this movie about the president’s assassination constitutes a specific, targeted, although veiled, threat. What say you?
#10 jimb
I’m not so sure you’re right when it comes to certain people around here.
Regarding the movie being a veiled threat, sounds like the making of a good conspiracy. Does that make you a conspiracy theorist who has no credibility?
Oh!™
I just want to point out that if President Bush were assasinated now or in a year, or if they start the impeachment process after the November elections … that Dick Cheney will be president.
Is that really what the left wants?
11 - Nope. Only the government is in the job of conspiracies, as we all know. Hollywood is just their unwitting pawns…
perhaps this fiend will make a movie about Michael Moore being killed.
Why not Nancy Pelosie or Hillary Clinton.
I would be really upset if they made one about Jimma Carter or Bill Clinton, they are way to intertaining and illustrate the just plain silly side of the liberal movement.
rj
I don’t advocate the shooting of libs either, but the mental picture of seeing them rounded up like that scene in The Planet of the Apes does make me chuckle. We need to have libs running around freely so that everyone knows first-hand how a lunatic behaves.
#9
Must be better than what you do now. Are you sure Mcdonalds would have you?
jimb
That’s a shrubbery…
maybe this busch?
http://www.beercollections.com/Breweries/Missouri/Images/IM251612.gif
trl3
LOL you’re such a douchebag! Maybe you can train me on the french fry equipment!
no liberal is worth a dollar per round. Second, they would take your firearm
away, and certainly no liberal is worth that much either. Finally, no conservative
would shoot a liberal, because by the time you clean all the $h-t off the carcass,
there is nothing left of any value to salvage.
Actually Shakey, conservatives wish liberals to live a VERY VERY long time.
After all, what worse punishment could there be for a liberal than to have them
live with themselves that long. Gotta confess though, I’ve never wondered why
you shake your head.
Let’s try that again:
First of all, no conservative would shoot a liberal. Ammo is expensive and no liberal is worth a dollar per round. Second, they would take your firearm away, and certainly no liberal is worth that much either. Finally, no conservative
would shoot a liberal, because by the time you clean all the $h-t off the carcass, there is nothing left of any value to salvage.
Actually Shakey, conservatives wish liberals to live a VERY VERY long time. After all, what worse punishment could there be for a liberal than to have them live with themselves that long. Gotta confess though, I’ve never wondered why
you shake your head.
MODERATOR/EDITOR, please delete previous post.
StacyE, you’ve been reading Cam Edward’s Blog haven’t you…
No actually - but I will now that you mention it.
#18 headshaker
I am so upset. You called me a name, which of course for liberals is not unusual. Since you cannot win with facts and logic that is all you have left.
I think all the headshaking must have given you brain damage.
This site has deteriorated. It used to be a location where I could read some intelligent posts. Just allow a liberal in and see how rapidly it falls into a name calling garbage pit; and the alleged conservatives just follow suit. Come on guys just ignore them and they will go away on their own. Let them get back to their AAR.
Me a liberal? Ha!
As for namecalling and hate speech, look no further than the posts of Neocon, Big45, and the other usual suspects.
Give me a break!
And, trl3 attacked me first. You people crack me up.
#26 Did I mention any names or posts? The guilty seem to rise to the top e.g. the first to cackle laid the egg. I was simply making an observation, based on my recent experiences involving the last few months, not an accusation.
Shakey: Take the bait out of the water and they won’t have anything to bite on.
malcolm, there was no bait. My original comment had to do with Double Standards for which trl decided to attack.
the so called docudrama could have just as easily used a kidnaping, beheading and multilation of a civilan contract worker to stimulate a discussion on the war on terrorism, etc…instead of using a killing of a President but that would slant the debate more in favor of the administration than to the terrorist.
LTC
#30
But that was not what this film maker desired! He wanted to make a politcal statement that Bush should die! Wonder what would happen if a film came out with bill klinton being beheaded? The Libs would be screaming! Remember Michael Moore’s film was a “docudrama.” What a crock that was and that is what this is!
Neo, I think it would be more appropriate to have a docudrama about Clinton being “headed”.
LOL sorry!
Why do they call it Ovaltine? Its in a round jar. It should be called “Roundtine”.
The makers of toilet paper, trash bags and tampons never have to worry about customer returns.
#33….no, it should be called ‘Cylindricaltime” as it’s in a cylindrical container!
‘Cylindricaltine’to be more exact!