Top
Comments
8 Responses to “Chron circulation dips 3.6 percent”
  1. malcolm on October 30th, 2006 at 12:01 pm

    Oneth! Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of folks! :-)

  2. Narly on October 30th, 2006 at 12:19 pm

    I miss the Post.

  3. stogusmaximus on October 30th, 2006 at 12:36 pm

    This is the form email I send to the Chron when I receive the “free copies”, since sending the email, they have greatly reduced littering my yard.

    To: onlinesubscriptions@chron.com

    Please stop delivering the complimentary editions of your newspaper to my address. Your paper is unread, and unwanted at my home and therefore should not be delivered.

    I consider these deliveries as littering my property as ask that you stop at once.

    I am also sending a copy of this email to the advertiser in your paper who sponsored the complimentary issue.

    [My Name]
    [My Address]

  4. Me_Myself_n_I on October 30th, 2006 at 12:49 pm

    Those numbers don’t add up…

    Sep 06 circulation = 508,097 (-3.6%)
    This indicates the previous circulation count in Mar 06 should be 527,072 not 513,387 as indicated in the Sep 2005 circulation post http://lonestartimes.com/2006/05/08/newspaper-circulation-skid-continues/

    If it was truly a 3.6% decline, the correct circulation number should be 494,905. Otherwise the decline is a MERE 1.03%.

    Please correct me, if I’ve missed something…

  5. tedtam on October 30th, 2006 at 1:25 pm

    And we are surprised how???

  6. Neocon on October 30th, 2006 at 2:51 pm

    Yawn :0

  7. Al Williams on October 30th, 2006 at 4:25 pm

    newspapers are so last century….

  8. vlou on October 30th, 2006 at 10:01 pm

    I don’t care about reading about Liberals who spin the news events, etc. to their own liking and mislead the public. They are not fair in publishing the facts or the truth.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom