Top
Comments
36 Responses to “Letters from an absention”
  1. Kevin Whited on October 31st, 2006 at 8:53 am

    Richard Friedman isn’t really the issue anyway.

    Any conservative vote for Richard Friedman is effectively a vote for Chris Bell, whose spending agenda WILL get moved by a coalition of Dems and RINOs in the lege.

    And Governor Bell’s appointments to state offices most decidedly will NOT be conservative.

    People should vote their consciences, of course, but conservatives should be aware that a vote for Kinky has decidedly anti-conservative implications.

  2. David Benzion on October 31st, 2006 at 9:08 am

    Owen– Carpetbagger! ;)

    Dr. Whited– There is some sort of mind-game voodoo you are playing by referring to Kinky twice as “Richard Friedman”… I don’t know exactly what it is, but I’m watching you. :#

    BTW, is blogHouston going to be making “endorsements” or “suggestions” or some such?

  3. dowjones25k on October 31st, 2006 at 9:08 am

    #1 the conservatives perry drewdip my state house and senate reps all voted this tax and no caps.

    these good conservatives you speak off ignored all 5 props from the primary and not one would answer me why.

    and you call them good conservatives. i voted for not one of them because they did not respond and voted against those props in every vote they cast.

  4. jimb on October 31st, 2006 at 9:47 am

    Richard Friedman is the man’s name, no? Kinky is a marketing term, a stage name, just like Grandma…

  5. David Benzion on October 31st, 2006 at 9:53 am

    The Republican Secretary of State says Kinky Friedman has used the name Kinky long enough and in enough non-political contexts to warrant being listed on the ballot as “Richard ‘Kinky’ Friedman”… so make of that, what you will.

  6. Kevin Whited on October 31st, 2006 at 9:55 am

    Richard Friedman is the guy’s given name.

    I’m not planning on any endorsements, no. That’s the job of voters.

    Blogs and websites are valuable tools for offering alternative views on the news of the day. They are potentially useful tools for screening/vetting candidates.

    But I disagree strongly with the notion that blogs should emulate elitist editorial boards in endorsing candidates. My own notion is that the editorial board model of screening and recommending candidates was useful back when information was expensive/hard to obtain, but that now it’s just an anachronism. I’d much prefer that news outlets or editorial boards or even blogs do hard-hitting interviews with candidates, post that for all to see, and let voters decide whom to endorse. I don’t want or NEED anyone to do the endorsing for me, but I do want the raw data.

    It feels really pretentious for me to tell somebody how to vote. Now, you want me to discuss various candidates’ positions, or assess whether those positions are liberal/conservative, or whether they are good policy, or what the implications of a vote for a candidate might be — okay. Different sort of thing. But I’ll leave the endorsing to voters.

  7. jimb on October 31st, 2006 at 9:59 am

    That’s fine, but I think that using a stage name in the governor’s office is a bit of disrespect to the office. Enough people don’t take Texas seriously. Maybe I’m just being picky, but I certainly think Dr. Whited’s use of Richard when referring to Friedman is appropriate.

    Besides, doncha think that “Rick Friedman” would be sort of ironically satisfying if the guy managed to win??

  8. ProudHoustonian on October 31st, 2006 at 10:10 am

    Owen and Kevin,
    Thank y’all. This Kinky idea is a little scary and it is turning me off of LST. The Governor’s office is not a joke. It is serious business. And the social ideals that Kinky would like to plaster across Texas do not represent what Texas should be about.
    I want to live in a state that is proud to use the Death Penalty - because we want the bad guys to be scared.
    I want to live in a state where the people are proud to take care of themselves - not expect to be taken care of.
    I want to live in a state full of hunters - led by a man that truly appreciates the citizens that don camo and carry shotguns and rifles.
    I want to live in a state that dislikes abortion and gay marriage and is not afraid to let everyone know it.
    Kinky is not my idea of a governor.

  9. dcgirl on October 31st, 2006 at 10:18 am

    Owen, please explain your quote below. I am not aware of anything, other than tort reform, that Perry did that was conservative. Please enlighten me.

    My vote would have been based on the fact that Perry, although not an excellent governor, has made inroads on some basic conservative positions.

    P.S. on the subject of tort reform, since Perry doesn’t seem concerned (other than his lying ads) about illegals in Texas, I guess I am SOL if a company hires an illegal which in turn harms me. In this case, tort reform helps the company which hired the illegal.

  10. David Benzion on October 31st, 2006 at 10:26 am

    BTW, I give Joe Nixon credit for passing tort reform. Seriously. I’ve studied the issue, and he really did yeoman’s work getting it passed.

    In fact, I can state hands down that if Joe Nixon were running for Governor against Kinky, I’d vote for MoJo.

  11. vlou on October 31st, 2006 at 10:29 am

    GO KINKY, GO! We don’t need “pretty boys” in the Governor’s mansion…Kinky genuinely cares about TEXAS, not about whether anyone is going to like him…at least he is honest about it.

  12. jimb on October 31st, 2006 at 10:31 am

    “Why the hell not” doesn’t convey deep caring about the state of Texas to me.

  13. jimb on October 31st, 2006 at 10:31 am

    Boy, I will be glad when this election is over.

  14. vlou on October 31st, 2006 at 10:35 am

    Only the legislative body can change state laws against gay marriage via a vote to the state constitution. Abortion is a federal issue. Don’t waffle and say it is the governor’s doing.

  15. jimb on October 31st, 2006 at 10:39 am

    Kinky’s position, in my mind, is unlcear on “trigger legislation” re: abortion. His pro-abortion and anti-death penalty positions can and will affect his policy decisions and court appointments.

  16. The Dude on October 31st, 2006 at 11:01 am

    Dr. Whited,

    I’m not planning on any endorsements, no. That’s the job of voters.

    Although I disagree with you on Kinky’s suitability for office, I thoroughly respect the above statement. I was a bit astounded that so many people asked LST for an endorsement list frankly.

  17. David Benzion on October 31st, 2006 at 11:09 am

    Dude and Kevin– I was astounded too.

    That’s why these aren’t Old Media style “endorsements”– we are making suggestions about how people might want to consider voting.

    Folks were asking for an indication of what our thinking was on various races… as far as I’m concerned, they should take our leanings, throw them into a larger mix, and come to their own conclusions.

  18. SRK2000 on October 31st, 2006 at 11:13 am

    Rick Perry is, quite simply, a dishonest man. And I don’t vote for dishonest men or women. His ads about $2K tax cuts were the laugh of the town, and I wrote him back in January and informed his offcie that if action was not taken on illegal immigration before the election, I would campaign strongly against him and every other poltician that allows this travesty to continue. I got a letter back saying immigration is the fed’s problem, not ours, that there is nothing Texas can do and that the courts require us to offer them services. Now this fool is running ads talking about all the action he has taken on illegal immigration. He’s a liar — throw him out, plain and simple. if the Republicans want someone in the Texas Governor’s mansion they will have to find a candidate who talks the talk and walks the walk.

  19. The Dude on October 31st, 2006 at 11:16 am

    To your credit David, you did make that clear up front. Honestly though, it kind of scares me to hear people asking to be led to that extent. On one hand, it’s great to seek and consider the opinions of others to form your own conclusion. On the other, the term “sheeple” jumped to mind. That was my knee-jerk reaction, anyway.

  20. Big45Iron on October 31st, 2006 at 11:21 am

    Perry made inroads on some basic conservative positions - for goodness sakes, that’s what we hired (voted) for him to do. BUT, if I only do 25% or 50% or 75% of my job, my butt would get fired. We hired Rick Perry to do the whole job. He’s had six years to do it. He hasn’t gotten the job done. Rick, YOU’RE FIRED.

  21. shannon on October 31st, 2006 at 11:35 am

    What a legacy……

    “I made inroads on conservative positions.”

    What a joke.

  22. trl3 on October 31st, 2006 at 12:12 pm

    I have heard it many times “a vote for Kinky is a vote for Bell”. Isn’t pitiful that the best arguement my fellow conservatives can come up with to convince Kinky supporters to come back to Perry is a vote for Kinky could help Bell.

    Personally I think Bell should come in last in a 5 way race. I cannot vote for Perry anymore because I have seen him in action and he has not represented my intrest.

    I hope Kinky wins.

  23. trl3 on October 31st, 2006 at 12:15 pm

    May I suggest that Perry votes reconsider and vote for Kinky.

    After all you would not want Bell to win and a vote for Perry is a vote for Bell.

  24. trl3 on October 31st, 2006 at 12:24 pm

    No doubt Kinky is not Politically correct and he does not act like a polititian. That is 2 more things I like about him.

  25. trl3 on October 31st, 2006 at 12:26 pm

    #15

    Kinky publically stated that he would sign a trigger law if passed by the legislature. Surprised me too. If elected and he failed to sign the bill he would then have broken his word and forfit my support.

  26. jimb on October 31st, 2006 at 1:49 pm

    #23 - I don’t think I believe Friedman on the trigger bill. We’ll see, I guess.

    Isn’t pitiful that the best arguement my fellow conservatives can come up with to convince Kinky supporters to come back to Perry is a vote for Kinky could help Bell.

    Not any more pitiful than it is that the most compelling reason to vote for Friedman is that Perry sucks. Or that fellow conservatives are voting for a liberal since Perry sucks.

  27. trl3 on October 31st, 2006 at 1:55 pm

    # 26.

    I am not supporting Kinky because Perry sucks, which he does. Perry lost my respect and my support and I went in search of a canidate that most closely represents my beliefs, values, and ideas. Kinky was that canidate.

  28. jimb on October 31st, 2006 at 2:00 pm

    #27 - You’ve said that before. I submit you’re settling for a liberal…

  29. Owen Courrèges on October 31st, 2006 at 3:36 pm

    dcgirl,

    Perry keep both taxes and spending low. If I recall correctly, he also signed tort reform capping med mal awards, signed a parental consent law on abortion, and signed a ban on partial birth abortions. He also has had a record number of vetoes — refusing to pass anything that comes down the pipeline.

    I don’t think Perry is a great governor, as I said, but he is conservative and has done some good things as governor.

  30. Definitely Blonde on October 31st, 2006 at 3:50 pm

    # 29 - kept spend low - yea right with a 20% increase in the budget!

  31. Big45Iron on October 31st, 2006 at 4:00 pm

    That’s not Owen saying that. It’s some clone who’s been inhaling? Kept taxes and spending low? Certainly you can’t be serious. 9% increases statewide PER YEAR for property taxes?
    A new increase in business taxes? A 15 billion surplus which they mostly spent? Owen, you need to move back here. You’ve spent too much time back in New Orleans already. You’re back to expecting governments to be totally irresponsible and for the citizens to accept it. Not me sir.

  32. jimb on October 31st, 2006 at 5:59 pm

    Oh, so now we can’t say that Perry did ANYTHING good without getting flamed? Geez, people, let’s have some semblance of rationality, at least!

  33. glynne on October 31st, 2006 at 6:36 pm

    I think one thing we can all agree on is that our current options are all poor. That’s the way I see it anyway and I still have no idea what I’m going to do before the 3rd.

    I am considering blerting out sometime while I’m there, “All my options suck!”

    I was wondering if I could get in trouble if I stuck a “FOR SALE” sign on a Perry sign?

  34. Squawkbox Noise on October 31st, 2006 at 6:39 pm

    glynne

    You mean like this one?

  35. KRogers on October 31st, 2006 at 10:00 pm

    Owen, we miss you and your sweet wife. We don’t hear from your mother-in-law enough, either here in Friendswood or on LST!

  36. OdinsAcolyte on November 1st, 2006 at 10:11 am

    And on this note, let me say, the governor of Texas has little power. It is a PR position. The governor can do very little other than talk…

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom