The title just about says it all. Neal Pierce, a syndicated columnist generally run by the Chronicle for his advocacy of “Smart Growth” strategies, has penned a column claiming that if not for the electoral college, Bush would not be president today, and furthermore, if not for dual four-year terms, we’d have a new president very soon:
[Recently deceased former president Gerald] Ford, it’s worth noting, was a vigorous, life-long supporter of electoral reform…
For decades, Ford supported abolishing the Electoral College and giving the people the right to vote directly for president…
There’s another reform we might consider in these times: a single six-year term for president…
Think of it this way. With a direct vote for president in 2000, we’d almost surely not be bogged down in the disastrously ill-advised Iraq War. And with a single six-year presidential term, we’d be preparing for the inauguration of a brand new president in less than two weeks from now.
We already know Pierce is an intellectually dishonest hack. He continually cites rising numbers in transit usage, but fails to note that these numbers are rising far slower relative to automobile and highway usage. This is the art of lying by eliminating all context.
He does the same thing here. He insists that without the electoral college, Gore would be president today (and assumes, without argument, that this would be a good thing). The problem is that the electoral college completely changes the way campaigns are run. Instead of running with the popular vote in mind, candidates stay focused on a few battleground states, writing off all others as locks or lost causes. In this battle, Bush won.
Now, if Bush and Gore had run in a hypothetical popular vote contest, they wouldn’t have focused on a few battleground states but upon the entire nation - they would have put their money strategically in population centers throughout the country. The dynamic would have been entirely different, and in that hypothetical race, neither Pierce nor I can speculate as to what the outcome would have been. As things were, it was a very close election.
Alas, that context would have interfered with Pierce’s sound bite, and we can’t have that, now can we?