Top
Comments
21 Responses to “Give us your tired, your poor, your huddled….”
  1. malcolm on February 1st, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    That’s a good reason as any to grant asylum. Reckon the judge is kin to the prosecutor Sutton?
    Things are getting WAY upside down…..

  2. trl3 on February 1st, 2007 at 3:00 pm

    don’t we have enough perverts without importing them?

  3. Robert on February 1st, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    Liberalism and being “PC” will make the United States a cesspool of perverts and degenerates. If we want to see what our future will be like just look at France.

  4. RickG on February 1st, 2007 at 3:39 pm

    At first glance, I thought the Ninth Circuit just HAD to have something to do with thus. Upon reading the story, I found out I was . . . right.

  5. Matt 'Zilla' Bramanti, CPO™ on February 1st, 2007 at 3:39 pm

    Notice the little stick people on the bottom right: two women and a guy.

    Gay marriage advocates always say it’s ridiculous for conservatives to argue that gay marriage will lead to normalizing other taboos, like polygamy. They are, of course, wrong.

  6. RickG on February 1st, 2007 at 3:44 pm

    5. Matt

    About a year ago, I read an article by Robert Bork supporting the Defense of Marriage Act. He discussed, among other things, some disturbing reulsts in countries which permitted gay marriage. I will try to find it.

  7. twocute64001 on February 1st, 2007 at 3:57 pm

    Look at it this way, when mexico is empty and they are riuning this country - we go to mexico - but put up a heck of a fence behind us. We can call the new country noliberialsallowed.

  8. DanielJames on February 1st, 2007 at 4:11 pm

    It just keeps getting better and better.

    Has God ended his blessing of America?

  9. ThunderHawkk on February 1st, 2007 at 4:12 pm

    What a joyful occasion! Oh, yes, such joy! Such proud parents!

    I’ll give it ten days. Certainly by that time, one of the guys will have met another guy who he wants to bed, and that’ll be that.

    Two men getting married… Please. Could anything be more ridiculous?

  10. emmekelley on February 1st, 2007 at 4:18 pm
  11. RickG on February 1st, 2007 at 4:28 pm

    10 emmekelley

    Nice job, e. That’s the one. I initially read it in First Things. Some of the comments I was referring to:

    “Studies of the effects of same-sex marriage in Scandinavia and the Netherlands by
    Stanley Kurtz raise at least the inference that when there is a powerful (and ultimately
    successful) campaign by secular elites for homosexual marriage, traditional marriage is
    demeaned and comes to be perceived as just one more sexual arrangement among others.
    The symbolic link between marriage, procreation, and family is broken, and there is a
    rapid and persistent decline in heterosexual marriages. . . .
    . . . Despite their use of the word “gay,” for many homosexuals life is anything but gay.
    Both physical and psychological disorders are far more prevalent among homosexual men than among heterosexual men. Attempted suicide rates, even in countries that are homosexual-friendly, are three to four times as high for homosexuals. Though it is
    frequently asserted by activists that high levels of internal distress in homosexual populations are caused by social disapproval, psychiatrist Jeffrey Satinover has shown that no studies support this theory.”

    I’m sure Bork is a homophobe, though. I guess a lot of facts must be too.

  12. bigjolly on February 1st, 2007 at 4:33 pm

    #8 DanielJames

    No.

  13. DanielJames on February 1st, 2007 at 5:10 pm

    I hope not!

  14. bigjolly on February 1st, 2007 at 5:14 pm

    #13 DanielJames

    Rest assured.

  15. nz-texas on February 1st, 2007 at 5:31 pm

    Guadalajara is closer to Coahuila than to America. Why didn’t he go there?

    Soto the joto???

  16. HomerJ on February 1st, 2007 at 5:50 pm

    Ever notice how inconsistent the liberal positions on sexuality are?

    Sexual preference with respect to partners is supposedly immutable - a gay guy has to have another gay guy as a partner. A masculine woman just won’t do. And this is unchangeable.

    But sexual preference with respect to parents is supposedly irrelevant - it doesn’t matter if a child’s parents are M/F, M/M or F/F (or who knows what combination). They are all supposedly equal in value.

    And sexual preference with respect to one’s gender is supposedly fluid - you could be a male physically but decide you are a female “inside.” Presumably, you could change back to male if you like.

    So what do you call it when a gay male (physical and gender choice) is with someone who is a female physically but a male by gender choice? Is that a gay relationship?

  17. Dov on February 1st, 2007 at 7:09 pm

    Anyone want to bet even money

    As I posted on another blog.

    How many Mexican’s are going to follow suit and claim they are Gay ? Even though they have wives and children. Thank this judge He/She just opened the door to a flood of illegal immigrant gays.

  18. TEX06 on February 1st, 2007 at 7:35 pm

    The “judge” must be a queer too!

  19. EricPJohnson on February 2nd, 2007 at 3:27 am

    Well,

    wearing garish outfits and shaking marachas does raise some questions…

  20. rj on February 2nd, 2007 at 7:37 am

    #8;
    “Has God ended his blessing of America?”
    No!
    We have just stopped receiving his blessings.
    rj

  21. vlou on February 2nd, 2007 at 8:47 am

    THIS IS AMERICA, but this is getting ridiculous and all they attorneys, judges and our whole government is insane. Perhaps we can grant all of them asylum in Mexico.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom