To read a well-written piece on a Russian architectural controversy, go to the Washington Post.
To read a stale rehash with no new information, go to the Houston Chronicle. As a bonus, you get columnist Cragg Hines’ routine factual errors and gratuitous use of French.
Filed Under Uncategorized ·







Over 50 minutes after the post went up and I’m first. Yippee!
Ah, this post s*cks. Never mind.
Willsin: There must have been at least three people who read those article and You and I were two of them. Matt was the third. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
/I cheated and scanned
Guess I’m fourth to read both articles. The WP piece wins for information and clarity, hands down.