Top
Comments
9 Responses to “November Ballot - Proposition 3”
  1. coffee on October 16th, 2007 at 7:45 am

    This is definitely needed, but don’t forget, the cap is still 10%. If you live in a district that is pushing your taxes up at anywhere near 10% a year, then you still have a reason to be upset.

  2. dowjones25k on October 16th, 2007 at 10:05 am

    and what brilliance do we owe this one to? repubs or dems?

  3. boi55 on October 16th, 2007 at 2:45 pm

    Obviously people believe that the Texas Legislature gave us something of value with the property tax reductions. Truth be told, that same Texas Legislature that some are commending actually is rewarding school districts that are raising their local taxes by just enough to not force a rollback. The only effective way to decrease your local taxes is to vote the scoundrels out of office that are raising your taxes.

    Wake up, Texas!

  4. bigjolly on October 16th, 2007 at 3:14 pm

    boi55,

    I don’t think anyone is “commending” the legislature for this bill. But we’ll take what we can when we can.

  5. dowjones25k on October 16th, 2007 at 3:17 pm

    #3 boi55 exactly and what party are they from HA HA HA the republican party. change the platform so your candidates don’t have to deceive us voters - heck i would vote for the lesser of 2 evils if ya did..

    yep and don’t you like the way they hide the new biz take from the taxpayers who don’t even know there is a tax on their retail or wholesale. gee republicans its great to see your continued deception.

  6. boi55 on October 16th, 2007 at 3:25 pm

    bigjolly,

    Did you not read Ms. Johnson’s commendation in the piece you authored? Thank you for making my point.

    Ask your local school district about “golden pennies.”

  7. bigjolly on October 16th, 2007 at 3:29 pm

    Yes, I read Ms. Johnson’s support. I also read a hundred other reports about it. It isn’t a lower cap but it some relief for some homeowners.

  8. KRogers on October 16th, 2007 at 8:01 pm

    I’m commending the brave legislators who went against their local school districts and voted “yea”. There was only one “no” vote!

    After the legislature rolled back our taxes, almost EVERY District has come back with an expensive bond issue. Look at my district, FISD! There go our “savings” — which were going to be gone after 3 years, but now they’ll be gone WITH BOND PAYMENTS!

    Can I mention http://www.vote4cheryl.com or will HAL get me:

  9. Zanthopsis on October 29th, 2007 at 4:04 pm

    While voters are being told that Proposition 3 will protect them from sticker shock in districts that do not appraise every year, a close reading of the last portion of the proposition suggests a possible different interpretation:

    “. . . the lesser of the most recent market value of the residence homestead as determined by the appraisal entity or 110 percent, or a greater percentage, of the appraised value of the residence homestead for the preceding tax year.”

    It is the phrase “or a greater percentage,” that is problematic. The meaning of the phrase in the proposition is vague, but it may allow the legislature to revise the 110% value to any value they wish without going back to the voters (i.e. by statute), or it may give permission to appraisal districts to set the percentage increase to anything they want, effectively removing the cap on property tax increase. If the phrase “or a greater percentage,” were removed from the proposition it would achieve the desired goal of limiting the appraised value increase, but its inclusion makes interpretation of the meaning of the proposition unclear and uncertain.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom