Top
Comments
55 Responses to “Is World Net Daily ‘Helping’ Fan the Flames on the Border?”
  1. american woman on October 18th, 2007 at 9:12 am

    From what I saw in the ” border movie” this could happen frequently. I’m not defending World Net Daily. I wonder how often the same tactics are used to get the drugs here. If it works, why would the smugglers change things?

  2. squawkbox on October 18th, 2007 at 9:15 am

    I detect an agenda….. Who cares about accuracy in the news as long as we can whip the proletariat into foaming anger.

  3. bigjolly on October 18th, 2007 at 9:17 am

    AW, would you be so nonchalant about this if the article was reversed and it made the illegals look good, not bad?

  4. duhmoose on October 18th, 2007 at 9:18 am

    Is it possible we have passed the point where the two sides of the border argument can have a civil discussion based on facts? Both sides seem to be focusing on rhetoric and biased stories to prop up their support. I am even beginning to hear people who are otherwise very reasonable become knee-jerk reactionaries on this topic.

  5. RickG on October 18th, 2007 at 9:18 am

    World Nut Daily - your source for propaganda and disinformation.

    Anyone who relies on WND for info not verified elsewhere risks looking like a dupe. Some look like dupes with an audience.

  6. bigjolly on October 18th, 2007 at 9:23 am

    duhmoose,

    In a direct answer, no, I don’t think it’s possible.

    How can we possibly overlook stuff like this and at the same time rail against bias in the MSM?

  7. RickG on October 18th, 2007 at 9:25 am

    4. Duhmoose

    Good point. Not only possible, but probable. I think the sides started talking past each other during the amnesty debate and never looked back. Now it seems like we are approaching the point where the end justifies the means for both sides, a sort of no-truth-zone.

  8. bigjolly on October 18th, 2007 at 9:26 am

    And if you want to see something even stranger, check out this video of the woman the Nuts used as their original source. In it, she says that she’s been involved in protecting both of California’s borders, the south and the north.

    What, are people from Oregon invading too? Makes you question everything about Nut Daily.

    http://lang.dailybulletin.com/projects/video/012406_interview.wmv

  9. duhmoose on October 18th, 2007 at 9:28 am

    bigjolly, maybe she’s keeping those crazy Californian’s in instead of trying to keep others out.

  10. RickG on October 18th, 2007 at 9:33 am

    8 bigjolly

    Obviously, World Nut Daily has no standards. Even the lib publications fire people who are found to have lied (remember Jason Blair), and WND does what? Will we hear Michael Savage or other talk-show hosts railing against the liars at WND? Doubtful.

  11. Fasternu 426 on October 18th, 2007 at 9:40 am

    There you go again Bigjolly, you’re just being a squishy headed communist lefty sympathizer! ;)

    Good call! I know this stuff happens. There are too many real incidents to resort to crap like this. I used to read WND, but not any more. They are more like the right wing version of Weekly World News. I’m waiting for a ‘Bat Boy’ story….
    http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/

  12. texpat on October 18th, 2007 at 9:44 am

    big jolly

    The link to the article yesterday is a dead end. They have taken it down. Nothing turns up on the WND internal search or on Google. You caught them !

  13. ljhopkins on October 18th, 2007 at 9:44 am

    ITS STILL A Problem, FAN THE FLAMES,
    When I cant get an interview for a job I am over qualified for because I dont speak spanish, I have a problem.
    When asked why I need to speak spanish for a position in the US as a quality manager I was told that because the production people speak spanish.

    DELETED

    Opinions are welcome, cursing is not. LST Moderator

  14. bigjolly on October 18th, 2007 at 9:48 am

    Ha, that’s funny texpat.

  15. texpat on October 18th, 2007 at 9:52 am

    I suspect they monitored the trackbacks and saw your post. What a bunch of creeps.

  16. hamous on October 18th, 2007 at 9:56 am

    I have requested an explanation from the WND editors on this “breaking news” story. If I receive one I’ll post it here.

  17. Bannable Lecturer on October 18th, 2007 at 10:02 am

    WND

    Started the Ramos and Compean outrage when they stated that Prosecutor Kanoff received a conviction when she screamed at Compean that he did this to his own people

    Of course, the transcripts have no record of Kanoff saying anything close to that

  18. David Benzion on October 18th, 2007 at 10:10 am

    Liberal.

  19. Adee on October 18th, 2007 at 10:14 am

    Congratulations BJ and Hamous on tracking this to the end, wherever and to whomever it leads. Fake is fake regardless of source or agenda.

  20. Vic on October 18th, 2007 at 10:35 am

    Good to see the crowd here at LST is learning to be skeptical of ALL media. I know it always made a good story to say that the “Media” was “Liberally” Biased. And, no doubt that is out there, but, “fixing” the problem with bias that leans towards your side does nothing to fix the problem.

    I probably wouldn’t hate foxnews so much if they’d just get rid of their “fair and balanced” BS and come out directly and say that they are a news organization that leans to the right.

    But, alot of people like to be fed BS b/c it makes them feel good. I’m glad to see that people here are becoming skeptical of bias from all sides

  21. Triplehelix on October 18th, 2007 at 10:43 am

    I notice when you go to responces on the thread about John Cornyn getting it done, there is a World Net Daily poll right here on Lone Star Times.

  22. trl3 on October 18th, 2007 at 10:47 am

    Could posting an old story have any thing to do with the head of Homeland Security claiming that it didn’t happen and the fact that NOTHING has been done to correct the possibility of it happening again?

  23. bigjolly on October 18th, 2007 at 10:59 am

    trl3,

    That isn’t what they did. They reworded the story and presented it as a new incident. There’s no need to make things up to make your case that we need to continue to focus on the border.

    And after reading the old story, it’s highly doubtful that it happened as presented then.

  24. monkeyincognito on October 18th, 2007 at 11:05 am

    WND, almost as bad as the NYT. Really, I quit reading them years ago and generally dismiss any argument referencing one of their articles. If they were a blog, they would be Kos.

  25. texpat on October 18th, 2007 at 11:06 am

    #20 Vic

    WND has never been considered reliable source of information for contributors here. That is not to say everything they publish is wrong, but they have proven themselves to be suspect. I will quote and link to any source I can corroborate and if I can’t, I’ll state it as such. That includes CBS, NBC, ABC, The Nation, The New Republic or Fox News Channel. Just because I link to a Reuters story doesn’t mean I endorse their demonstrated bias or condone the documented deceptive reportage they have delivered in the past. I don’t trust them anymore than I trust Farah’s WND.

  26. Shannon on October 18th, 2007 at 11:06 am

    #2 Heh

  27. hamous on October 18th, 2007 at 11:12 am

    Good to see the crowd here at LST is learning to be skeptical of ALL media.

    I’m glad to see that people here are becoming skeptical of bias from all sides

    I think we have always been skeptical, no matter what the source. Bias is one thing. Deception is quite another.

  28. Katfish on October 18th, 2007 at 11:39 am

    *sidebar alert*!!!

    If yall think Dubbya’s oratorial skills are less than stellar (maybe because they ARE? snikker)

    Eagle Pass TX Mayor was on O’Reilly last nite ‘trying’ to discuss the border issue……..Lordy Dubbya’s skills match Oliver Wendell Holmes next to THAT guy!

  29. trl3 on October 18th, 2007 at 12:36 pm

    BigJolly

    It is highly doubtful that it happened as presented then?

    I have heard the Sheriff of Hudspeth County interview about the incident and he supports the story. That nothing has been done to eliminate a similar incident is evident from recent pictures.

    Of course the Sheriff of Hudspeth county could have been making it up since we know BigJ can not possibly be wrong.

  30. hamous on October 18th, 2007 at 1:12 pm

    trl3 - It seems to me that the fact another incident hasn’t occurred, and WND had to resort to posting a two-year-old story as “breaking news”, is a pretty good indication that maybe something has indeed been done to eliminate similar incidents.

  31. Shannon on October 18th, 2007 at 1:25 pm

    UREGENT!! URGENT ALERT!!!

    Red Meat Shortage At WND!!!!

    News at 11.

  32. squawkbox on October 18th, 2007 at 2:08 pm

    trl3
    “the incident” happened. Only “the incident” in question happened over a year ago. WND tried to pull a fast one and got caught.

    Your accusations against Bigjolly are unfounded, petty and trite.

  33. squawkbox on October 18th, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    And furthermore there are 3 other names associated (note the hat tip at the bottom) with the LST story, are you suggesting that “we made stuff up” too?

  34. american woman on October 18th, 2007 at 2:34 pm

    So the article was false? No BigJ, I don’t approve of World Net Daily, placing phony articles to fire people up. My post this morning was meant to say……… if we are critizing their article because it sounds like the first one, it’s because they bring in drugs the same way repeatedly. I do not understand why World Net Daily needs to lie about a problem where there is enough info to have something new and fresh daily. Would I be as incensed if this story were run by the other side? My bias is for my point of view.

  35. hamous on October 18th, 2007 at 3:04 pm

    AW, I hate to belabor the point, but if they continue to bring in drugs the same way (Mexican Army with machine gun turrets on US soil) why have there been no new stories? Why did WND have to resurrect an almost two year old story? If this was routinely happening I would be ticked off if every news media outlet didn’t have it plastered all over their front page.

  36. american woman on October 18th, 2007 at 3:18 pm

    #35 Hamous, In the Border Movie, they stated the Mexican Army with machine guns in turrets are on our side all the time…. they run into each other. Sometimes, they get lost, sometimes it’s for other reasons. The point is it happens frequently. There is no outcry about illegal drug smuggling on the boarder, period. When have you seen the MSM say anything? It happens nightly, one way or another. I meant…….. there is enough info nightly, if anyone cared, to write articles about the smuggling that goes on. Those on the border know the Mexican military is on American soil frequently. That’s not such an outrage to me, as the mule trains of drugs coming in nightly, or being smuggled in, in other ways.

  37. hamous on October 18th, 2007 at 3:40 pm

    AW, I googled drug smugglers mexican border and found news stories from:

    AP
    Fox
    Houston Chronicle
    Dallas Morning News
    ABC
    CBS
    NBC
    Fort Worth Star Telegram
    Seattle Times

    and about 350 other hits. Most of us agree there is a serious lack of control on the border. The point of this story is there is no need to whip up a frenzy by misleading your readers. There is enough real news to do that. It’s intellectually dishonest and WND knows that. That’s why they took the story down as soon as people started smelling a rat. I hoped they would respond but no word yet.

  38. american woman on October 18th, 2007 at 3:46 pm

    Hamous I agree there is no reason to run a false story. I don’t go to the internet for news, maybe that’s why I’m not hearing much. I get it from the radio.

  39. GriffithLea on October 18th, 2007 at 3:53 pm

    I thought that that article sounded familiar when I skimmed it yesterday. I meant to look at it more closely later on, to see if it was a similar occurrence, or one of their “on this day in 200x” posts, but I didn’t get around to it. It didn’t occur to me that it might be microwaved news. I hope they come up with a good explanation for what happened, because up to this point I’ve always liked and trusted WND for the most part.

  40. american woman on October 18th, 2007 at 3:55 pm

    Oh, I read Drudge. Sometimes Breitbart ……

  41. GriffithLea on October 18th, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    I just emailed corrections@worldnetdaily.com and gave them the permalink.

  42. GoodJobTim on October 18th, 2007 at 9:03 pm

    #32
    Squawk

    Unless I’m misunderstanding you, BJ said in his #23 he thought the original story was doubtful after last night saying the story was reported all over the place when originally reported.

  43. squawkbox on October 18th, 2007 at 9:19 pm

    Can’t speak for BigJolly and his beliefs GJT.

    However from all that I read and heard when the “first story” broke I believe it was legit. Guess I shoulda made that distinction. Thanks for keepin me straight.

  44. bigjolly on October 18th, 2007 at 9:54 pm

    GJT,

    I said that it’s doubtful that it happened “as presented”. I’ve no doubt that something happened, I too heard the sheriff at the time. But listening to the reporter in the link I put above, she’s not “right”. She’s enjoying her 2 minutes of fame a little too much and I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a bit of “embellishing” going on in her story in the Daily Bulletin, which is where WND first got it.

  45. trl3 on October 19th, 2007 at 6:53 am

    #30 #32

    The breaking news is that both the Mexican Government and the Department of Homeland Security just declared that it never happened.

    THAT IS WHY THE STORY WAS REPEATED!!!

  46. bigjolly on October 19th, 2007 at 7:30 am

    trl3

    Where did they “just declare” that it never happened? I can’t seem to find it but if you point me in the right direction, it might help to clear this up.

    Thanks.

  47. bigjolly on October 19th, 2007 at 7:31 am
  48. trl3 on October 19th, 2007 at 8:36 am

    Read the last paragraph of the story you supplied above.

    Possibly, It should have been the first paragraph so that it was clear that it was due to the denial of an old story. I would have made it the first paragraph.

    Now whether the paragraph was placed last to make it look like a new incident may be debatable but the fact remains the the DHS just tried to minimize the incident the day of this latest printing and Mexico denied it altogether about a week before the latest printing. I believe that is why the story was reprinted.

    I also believe the Sheriff and his accounting of the event, So I still believe that it did in fact happen and Photographs supplied by “eyes on the border” a month or so ago indicate nothing has been done to stop it from happening again.

    Have a good day and a great weekend, I have to go to the farm and finish the plowing so I can plant the wheat.

  49. hamous on October 19th, 2007 at 8:41 am

    trl3, two years ago the Mexican government denied it. And two years ago Chertoff didn’t say it never happened. According to the WND articles (the old one and the false one) he “downplayed” the incident.

    There is no excuse for fabricating a story. WND knows that. Why else would they quietly remove it and walk away whistling? If they were reputable they would print a retraction for attempting to mislead their readers.

    btw, still no reply from them.

  50. bigjolly on October 19th, 2007 at 8:50 am

    trl3

    C’mon. The proof is in the pudding. They pulled the fabricated story. Unfortunately, it is all over the net still as true. Check Liberty Post, FreeRepublic, etc.

    A complete fabrication is making it around the net. Not good.

  51. squawkbox on October 19th, 2007 at 8:59 am

    trl3
    I just finished Googling everything Chertoff has said and the papers have picked up for the last month. Guess what. Nothing was said about the border incursions. So I did a lexisnexis search (hat tip to one of clients for sharing his subscription with me) and guess what, to my dismay there was nothing found there.

    I stand by our assertion that the recent WND article is a bogus misrepresentation of CURRENT EVENTS. I still want to know the motivation.

  52. squawkbox on October 19th, 2007 at 9:05 am

    Finally
    Don’t you find it just the least bit suspect that the two stories are near mirror images of each other and not one “major publication” picked up on the story?

  53. trl3 on October 19th, 2007 at 9:09 am

    Guys deny it all you want, The same piece is about DHS down playing the story and Mexico denying the story is in every attachment BigJolly posted including No. 47.

    I you do not want to believe that is your god given right a an American.

  54. trl3 on October 19th, 2007 at 9:13 am

    One other final word before I start North to the farm,

    Failure to recognize an event for what it is or was, and the failure to take any preventive messures is why IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN. Remember you heard it here first.

    Have a Great weekend, I know I will.

  55. bigjolly on October 19th, 2007 at 9:59 am

    I agree. I recognized the fake article for what it was. I’m taking preventive measure to make certain that whenever I see people source WND, I won’t bother to read it.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom