Top
Comments
209 Responses to “Chron Bias: Joe Horn No Hero - He Is Our Enemy”
  1. Robert 1 on December 4th, 2007 at 7:54 am

    As usual the Crummyicle acted as “judge, jury and executioner” in writing about Mr. Horn. Look, you weren’t there, you don’t know all the facts but thru some devine wisdom you ascertained Mr. Horn’s guilt. How come the Crummyicle didn’t approach it from those two burglars point of view and say all they had to do was, first, not burglarize that home and take something that wasn’t theirs and then when confronted, they should have surrendered, allowed themselves to get arrested and taken their case to court and a jury and prove their innocense.

  2. Dave D on December 4th, 2007 at 7:54 am

    Bovine Scatology! Indeed!

  3. american woman on December 4th, 2007 at 7:57 am

    Is anyone going to shed a tear when the comical finally draws it’s last breath?

  4. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 8:04 am

    If only Sean Taylor had Joe Horn living next to him?

  5. bob42 on December 4th, 2007 at 8:07 am

    Hmm… So the chronicle disagrees with the man, slams him, and tries to make his supporters out to be kooks and racists.

    Now there’s a familiar tune, I know I’ve heard it before, but I can’t remember where.

  6. Fasternu 426 on December 4th, 2007 at 8:19 am

    Let me get this straight:

    Homeowner defending his neighbor’s home is a bad guy with sense of “Old West Entitlement”.

    Citizens/neighbors on scary motorcycles who rally around him are bad.

    Two thugs who broke into home and were shot (and BTW, had lengthy criminal records) are victims.

    Thug “activist” with racist agenda with sense of 5th Ward Entitlement is good.

    Dang, she sure has to reach far and wide to come to those conclusions….

    I sure hope (for her sake) no one breaks into her home, while a neighbor hides safely in their home with loaded gun to be lauded on page one as a hero when the crooks are later caught.

  7. blackgirl on December 4th, 2007 at 8:25 am

    People are tired of being crime victims and if things don’t change, right or wrong, we will see more of this.

  8. texpat on December 4th, 2007 at 8:39 am

    I am genuinely shocked at this article. Not because of the opinions of the reporter, but because this piece is appearing as a front-page news story in a major daily newspaper. Falkenberg does not even try to portray this as an objective piece of reporting. It is unapologetically “in your face” opinion. I am saving this to show to people when they tell me journalists in America are professional and unbiased. This is unbelievable to me.

  9. Shannon on December 4th, 2007 at 8:51 am

    By the way, in today’s print edition, the Falkenberg piece appears on the front of editorial section– it’s usual location.

  10. Ghost Rider on December 4th, 2007 at 9:11 am

    I think what I hate most about Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton is the way they inspire folks like Quanell No. 10 to do this DELETED. Can you imagine having a life so empty, having nothing better to do with your time? I know these folks crave attention, but I still strain to understand how they can find this activity to be uplifting.

    No need for cursing. Use a mature vocabulary. LST Moderator

  11. texpat on December 4th, 2007 at 9:20 am

    #9 Shannon

    Just tried to call you to ask that question. Are you saying it is in the editorial section or is it treated as a main news story ? Does it have “commentary” in the headline area ?

  12. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 9:21 am

    Here’s the actual 911 call

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f3d_1195171937

    the beeping is the redacted personal information

  13. bigjolly on December 4th, 2007 at 9:25 am

    texpat,

    The online edition has it front page. When you click on it, it is under the bold heading Front Page.

    I Googled her name and found that she was added as a columnist during Rick Casey’s departure.

    If this is opinion, it should be labeled as such.

  14. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 9:26 am

    BigJolly

    listen to the tape

  15. bigjolly on December 4th, 2007 at 9:27 am

    I’ve listened to it. Several times as a matter of fact. Long before you posted the link.

    I think that Mr. Horn was right in his actions. Clear enough for you?

  16. fink1 on December 4th, 2007 at 9:35 am

    First, I believe Joe Horn was motivated by a desire to protect his neighborhood and righteous anger at the crime he saw. He called 9-1-1 and basically got a lecture from the dispatcher. I still have not heard how long it was into the 6-minute or so call before the dispatcher sent patrol cars.

    Second, Falkenberg is a COLUMNIST, not a reporter. She is paid to state her OPINIONS and is not expected to withhold her biases. (Although more research in this situation could have produced a different opinion.) The Chronicle has run a local news columnist in that left hand column of the local news front for two decades.

    Leon Hale used to be there 2-3 days a week. So was Thom Marshall, who provided mostly pablum.

    Is Falkenberg biased? Yes, but that’s OK. Is the Chron biased? Yes, and that would be OK if the Chron did not deny it. (After all, when the First Amendment was written, the newspapers were owned by the various political parties.)The Chron’s bias really shows in this: It does not have a columnist offering conservative views of local events.

  17. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 9:35 am

    Sounded like he was itching to kill someone - without that call I would give Mr Horn the doubr - with that call -its going to be really really tough to convince a jury - look last I checked

    Burglary was not a capital crime.

    I have great sympathy - but this will go to trial either here or in Federal Court

    Mr Horn maybe a cause celeb but I think Q(x) may finally have a platform as well as the gunnuts.

  18. bigjolly on December 4th, 2007 at 9:37 am

    fink1,

    I don’t read the print edition. I read it online. This is presented as a Front Page story, check it out. I don’t know who Lisa Falkenberg is. Certainly her writing is full of opinion - it should be presented that way.

    Second, the bias shows in not putting Mr. Southworth front page. They didn’t think it newsworthy.

  19. Simple Simon on December 4th, 2007 at 9:39 am

    Big,

    The bias of the Chronicle writer is apparent. Was there a right way or wrong way to handle the situation….I dunno.. I was not there and I was not standing in Mr Horn’s shoes.

    I do believe there were a number of ways to handle the situation. All could have been correct depending upon the who, what, when, and where.

    I have had my home burglarized and immediately after the crime I felt like doing something far more cruel than shooting the culprits. The burglars (at least one) had been armed with a very scary home made knife, which he left in trade for the swag that he took. It scared me to think what could have happened if my wife or I had walked in on them during the burglary. I have since installed a very good burglar alarm system and have not had a second burglary.

    Regards
    Simple

  20. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 9:54 am

    Well,

    all this overheated got my gun got the right to shoot people rhetoric has ruined three lives.

    Three people, two dead, one facing certain emotional, financial and social stree beyond what we can imagine and we still have people coming in here and writing stuff like go get some articles.

    So that bag of loot - is an LA style riot breaks out - is going to end up costing that community more than all the postering and bloviating here.

    And yes crime is terrible - but doesn’t give you the right to kill.

  21. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 9:55 am

    That should be if an LA style riots breaks out

  22. Fasternu 426 on December 4th, 2007 at 10:21 am

    “all this overheated got my gun got the right to shoot people rhetoric has ruined three lives.”

    No, breaking into this guy’s neighbor’s house ruined those lives. I bet you’d blame the Allies for shooting at those poor German tourists in France in June of 1944.

  23. Matt Bramanti on December 4th, 2007 at 10:23 am

    Burglary was not a capital crime.

    Neither is pointing a gun at a police officer. But it’ll still get you shot.

    You’re confusing two issues:

    1. Is the death penalty a proper punishment for burglary? That is, is burglary a capital crime?

    2. Regardless of 1, did Horn satisfy the statutory requirements for being able to use deadly force?

    No one is claiming that Horn was an agent of the state, so your “not a capital crime” bleat is little more than a bumper sticker.

  24. Fasternu 426 on December 4th, 2007 at 10:25 am

    Free Tibet!
    Now, there’s a bumper sticker!

  25. fat albert on December 4th, 2007 at 10:28 am

    BL -

    The only thing that ruined the lives of the two dead criminals was their own decisions. THEY made the decision to break in to a house that wasn’t theirs, THEY made the decision to take what wasn’t theirs, THEY made the decision to not stop when confronted.

    The third life has been ruined by an out of control media, a warped legal system, and victims rights pimps like Quanell 10.

    And no, robbery doesn’t give you the right to kill, but defending yourself, your property and the property of your neighbor may force you to make that decision.

  26. hamous on December 4th, 2007 at 10:30 am

    Neither is pointing a gun at a police officer. But it’ll still get you shot.

    Best explanation yet.

  27. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 10:31 am

    Matt

    It was clear from the audio he intended to shoot them.

  28. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 10:32 am

    Skinny AL

    Our legal system doesn’t exactly work that way and the DA’s around here could give a flyin leap about Q(x)

  29. Hous bin Pharteen on December 4th, 2007 at 10:34 am

    Bannable,

    You are confusing the force necessary to stop a crime “in progress” with the punishment meted out in a court of law.

    Rape is not a capital crime; neither is armed robbery;neither is kidnapping. But if you get caught in the act of any of those, there’s a fairly good chance you are going to get shot and killed.

  30. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 10:34 am

    Matt

    If youintend to shoot someone that intent overides the statutory situation - or it will be real real difficult for a jury to seperate

    IMO

  31. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 10:35 am

    29

    Horn wasn’t raped - and he was the only one armed

  32. duhmoose on December 4th, 2007 at 10:35 am

    Bannable, I would hope that anyone approaching an armed criminal is willing to kill them. Anything else, and it just makes them a bigger target.

  33. duhmoose on December 4th, 2007 at 10:36 am

    Sorry, that should be criminal armed, not armed criminal.

  34. Hous bin Pharteen on December 4th, 2007 at 10:36 am

    #24 Fasternu,

    It should be “Free Tibet! (with qualifying purchase of Nepal)”

    Now THAT’S a bumper sticker!

  35. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 10:36 am

    22

    Faster you for exactly proving my point ;)

  36. Hous bin Pharteen on December 4th, 2007 at 10:37 am

    31 Bannable,

    Analogies are lost on you, huh?

  37. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 10:38 am

    36

    Analogies are for those out of a good argument ;)

  38. Hous bin Pharteen on December 4th, 2007 at 10:40 am

    37 Bannable,

    You seem impervious to a good argument also.

  39. T-Hawkk on December 4th, 2007 at 10:43 am

    If I have “suburban angst” can I get some sort of disability entitlement?

  40. hamous on December 4th, 2007 at 10:43 am

    Analogies are lost on you, huh?

    Along with most sound reasoning…

  41. fat albert on December 4th, 2007 at 10:44 am

    BL -

    1. I’ve listened to that audio track a half dozen times and I don’t think it’s that clear. He was going to confront them, and stop them, and I’ll even concede that he thought that he might have to shoot them, but I don’t know that he went out with the express purpose of taking lives.

    2. I’m also convinced that he was scared to death and he felt that he was taking the only path he could take.

    3. The dispatcher was no help at all. I got the impression that he was far more worried about what Horn might do then about the fact that 2 men were committing felony robbery.

  42. fat albert on December 4th, 2007 at 10:50 am

    BL -

    Unless you have abilities unknown to mortal man, you don’t know what Mr. Horn’s intent was. I mean seriously, you can infer his mindset and intent on the basis of what you heard in a fairly distorted phone recording?

  43. wfish on December 4th, 2007 at 11:01 am

    I would be pleased and honored to have Joe Horn
    as a neighbor. He’s a hero to me!

  44. NAT PIERCE on December 4th, 2007 at 11:04 am

    From last night, the anti-gun lobby will make this as a test case and they will use the media and every device possible to distort and accentuate anything questionable about the event to disadvantage of the citizen.

    Humans are imperfect creatures and Mr. Horn is no exception, professional law enforcement rarely makes “textbook” procedure discharging their duties, every situation is unique. To expect a civilian to discharge his rights and responsibilities at the level of a professional, a lawyer and police officer is extraordinary.

    “December 3rd, 2007 at 9:06 pm
    Mr. Horn’s case will set legal precedent and be used as a standard for all future judgments; the new state law will be interpreted and will either bolster one’s ability to defend his property or not.”

  45. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 11:08 am

    42

    No when people say things like

    I have the right

    I have a gun

    I know how to use it

    They arn’t gettin away I can tell you that

    I’m stoppin them

    And much much more

    What more do you need?

    did you hear him argue with the dispatcher when he ordered him to drop the gun and surrender

    Unreal

    personally I blame TV

  46. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 11:09 am

    38

    Its been years since I’ve seen a “good” argument - ask Hamous ;)

  47. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 11:09 am

    43

    Unless your 4 year old niece picked some of his flowers………

  48. Bannable Lecturer on December 4th, 2007 at 11:10 am

    Gunnuts - got to love em

  49. fink1 on December 4th, 2007 at 11:20 am

    bigjolly, re your comment, #18:

    Important points and you are absolutely right on the first one. The column now is listed under Top Stories, which is misleading because it is not a story but an opinion piece, a column. That distinction has slid by a bunch of Lone Star Times commenters.

    Hate the Chron as you may, you might be more effective on this Web site if you occasionally read and analysed the print version. The Chron claims to deliver its print version to about 300,000 addresses in Harris County alone.

    I do not like the Chron; I believe its top editors are both biased and arrogant. However, it does largely drive the news business and the public agenda in this area. Look how often LST refers to the Chron.

    I think you are wrong about bias driving the placement of the Southworth story. When you compare Southworth story and Horn story you find:

    –One dead burglar vs. two dead burglars
    –Porter vs. Pasadena
    –Defending your own property vs. your neighbor’s
    –Law is crystal clear vs. not as clear
    –pretty standard 9-1-1 tape vs. very dramatic 9-1-1 tape
    –Porter case just a pale repeat of Pasadena case. (Wanting NEW or dramatic stuff is not bias although it may be marketing.)

    Anyway, I like your stuff.

  50. Hous bin Pharteen on December 4th, 2007 at 11:25 am

    48,

    So, does that make you an anti-gun zealot?

  51. wfish on December 4th, 2007 at 11:31 am

    47

    BL, you’re in need of help. Please
    seek some professional assistance…
    or just take another pill and chill out.
    Comparing two full grown burglers breaking
    and entering to a four year old picking flowers?
    Yep, you need help. I’ll take Joe for a neighbor,
    but I do hope you live in another town…
    or another state.

  52. fat albert on December 4th, 2007 at 11:35 am

    45 -

    I have the right

    I have a gun

    I know how to use it

    They aren’t gettin away I can tell you that

    I’m stoppin them

    I’m sorry, I must have missed the part about “I’m going out to kill them.” Could you tell me where to find that line ’cause I missed it completely.

    What I read (and heard) was a citizen doing what we need citizens to do a lot more often. I get told all the time - “The job of a Cop is to arrest criminals.” So who do you think gets the job of stopping crimes before they happen?

    As far as arguing with a dispatcher, I give him credit to listening as long as he did. Who is the dispatcher? A nameless, faceless person, a long was away, with no authority, and no idea of the actual situation.

    So, actually, I’m going to more, a lot more!

  53. KRAUT on December 4th, 2007 at 11:52 am

    In a nutshell, two criminals were rehabilitated before they could hurt someone else. Criminals only get bolder the longer they’re allowed to ply their trade. He is a hero.

  54. trl3 on December 4th, 2007 at 12:11 pm

    The 2 criminals are dead because of their own actions. The criminals are responsible for their own deaths. Had they been out working for a living instead of stealing they would be alive today.

    Thank You Mr. Joe Horn for having the intestinal fortitude to do what was right.

  55. coldpizza on December 4th, 2007 at 12:11 pm

    In Southworth’s case, High five. in Horn’s a “you suck” would be appropriate and most suited. Horn was wrong and everyone knows it. Why cant people mind thier own business?

  56. Hous bin Pharteen on December 4th, 2007 at 12:16 pm

    55,

    I don’t think “everyone” means what you think it means.

  57. Hous bin Pharteen on December 4th, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    55,

    Unless by “everyone”, you mean “a few people, who either hate guns, or defend criminals”

  58. Robert 1 on December 4th, 2007 at 12:18 pm

    So be warned!!! you criminals out there need to fear the fact that there might be another Joe Horn out there willing to risk his life to stop you from committing a crime.

  59. coldpizza on December 4th, 2007 at 12:20 pm

    Its very simple to understand, If you arrogant DELETED want to defend a guy who was wrong and not care about Southworth who wasnt only defending HIS property but himself also.

    NO REASON TO USE PROFANITY, EVEN IF ITS AN ACRONYM. LST MODERATOR

  60. coldpizza on December 4th, 2007 at 12:22 pm

    then go ahead.

  61. Robert 1 on December 4th, 2007 at 12:24 pm

    Reply to No. 55: If everybody minded their own business, then there wouldn’t be any witnesses to a crime that might be perpetrated, even on you, “coldpizza”. There wouldn’t be anybody reporting child abuse or on the next terrorist, is that what you mean?????

  62. coldpizza on December 4th, 2007 at 12:25 pm

    Is it that hard to fathom? actually are you in the second grade?

  63. trl3 on December 4th, 2007 at 12:26 pm

    coldpizza #55

    The burglars were not minding their own business. Joe Horn wanted the police to handle the situation, that’s is why he called 911. That the police failed to arrive in time was the only reason Mr. Horn acted on his own. That the CRIMINALS failed to surrender and chose to move on Mr. Horn is the reason they are dead.

    But please do tell all of your neighbors that if they see anyone burglarizing your home to mind their own business.

  64. coldpizza on December 4th, 2007 at 12:27 pm

    Im in school. plenty of witnesses, make my day

  65. coldpizza on December 4th, 2007 at 12:28 pm

    I hate my neigbors and BTW Im southworth’s Grand daughter

  66. coldpizza on December 4th, 2007 at 12:30 pm

    and if narrow-mindedness is a more frequent in internet forums than i think it is than…

  67. trl3 on December 4th, 2007 at 12:30 pm

    Coldpizza

    Everyone would really like to know who you are so if we ever see you getting robbed, your wife being raped, or your house being burglarized we will know enought to mind our own business let the criminals do whatever they have a mind to do.

  68. bigjolly on December 4th, 2007 at 12:31 pm

    coldpizza,

    You need to re-read what I wrote. I’m saying that both men were right. Notice that I said the Chronicle should have put it on the front page.

    You judge too quickly and harshly.

  69. trl3 on December 4th, 2007 at 12:34 pm

    bigjolly

    The way I read it coldpizza believes that criminals have a right to be left alone to do whatever they want without interference from neighbors.

  70. DeepPurple on December 4th, 2007 at 12:34 pm

    **Applause** BJ! Well said!

  71. Robert 1 on December 4th, 2007 at 12:35 pm

    Reply to No. 64: So if you are in school and somebody decides to beat you up, do you want everybody to mind their own business. Look, people have to look after each other thats just the neighborly thing to do. The police cannot be everywhere, every time, that’s why they have neighborhood watches. That’s why Joe Horn stepped in. He witnessed, he reported, the police didn’t respond in time, he acted and now two criminals will not be able commit anymore crimes on you, me or anybody else.

  72. mkoch on December 4th, 2007 at 12:38 pm

    when this story 1st broke, even the Chronicle stated ” when Joe Horn went outside to confront the perps., he discovered that they had come into/onto his property and that they where only 15 feet from his front door”. That’s when he challenged them to STOP, and they choose “poorly” !

  73. trl3 on December 4th, 2007 at 12:40 pm

    Coldpizza

    Certianly you would not want any of your school mates to interfer if you became a crime victim. I mean don’t you want them to mind their own business and let the criminal do whatever they want to you?

    All of your school mates need to turn a blind eye and just walk on by.

  74. hamous on December 4th, 2007 at 12:46 pm

    wfish

    …but I do hope you live in another town…or another state.

    As luck would have it, another country on another continent!

  75. Robert 1 on December 4th, 2007 at 12:48 pm

    One has to wonder how the Crummyicle columnist would have written her piece if Joe Horn had been killed. Let’s see, maybe it would go something like this: “Joe Horn was killed for caring about somebody else’s property. That will teach him not to take the law into his own hands. Maybe he should have avoided confrontation by letting those criminals rob him at the same time so they don’t have to come back.”

  76. Hous bin Pharteen on December 4th, 2007 at 12:51 pm

    MODERATOR:

    Where did coldpizza’s comment go? It was at number 55. Several comments subsequent to that don’t make sense without his comment there.

    Sorry bout that. I have restored them.
    The LST Moderator

  77. mayfly22 on December 4th, 2007 at 1:09 pm

    Does Lisa Falkenberg and the Crummycile consider defending private property “Old West entitlement”?

  78. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 1:39 pm

    cp, Does the term community mean anything?

  79. Katfish on December 4th, 2007 at 1:44 pm

    #65 - “I hate my neigbors”
    easy enough for us to believe!

    “and BTW Im southworth’s Grand daughter”

    I can type that I’m Sam freakin Elliot and filthy rich and have a plethora of lady friends to do my bidding - doesn’t make it TRUE……….

  80. klayman on December 4th, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    Did’nt they just bury a football player in Miami who was shot by mere burglars? If only he had stayed in bed and let them loot his house….

    Mr Horn had the right to defend his neighbor’s property. However, he had even more right to defend his own when they moved toward his house.

  81. Phil_M on December 4th, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    One thing is clear from the 911 tape: Horn repeatedly informs the operator that was in fear of being harmed by the two thugs. He says something to the effect of “I’m afraid they’re going to kill me” at least once, and implies it directly several other times. He also says repeatedly that he is holding the shotgun in “self defense” on his own property. The shots also happened when they were in his own front yard.

    Another interesting point to be made is that the police response time was ridiculously slow. It took 7 minutes from the time the call was placed until Horn shot the perps and 8 minutes before the first cops arrived on the scene. For the first 6 minutes, Horn waited patiently on the phone with the dispatcher as a crime happened right in front of him with the police nowhere in site.

  82. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 1:47 pm

    Why does liking your neighbors have to do with doing the right thing?

  83. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 1:49 pm

    #80 My #4

    If only Sean Taylor had Joe Horn living next to him?

  84. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 1:52 pm

    Phil

    Were the perps shot in the chest or back?

    I ask simply because if I were in the perps shoes I wouldve been running away and wouldve been shot in the back… not the neck and chest.

    How do we send monies to Joe Horn for his legal fees?

  85. Peter on December 4th, 2007 at 2:04 pm

    From my understanding, one perp was shot in the chest and another in the side. I’ll see if I can locate where I read it and post a link.

  86. texpat on December 4th, 2007 at 2:05 pm

    #55 cold pizza

    If you came here to vent your spleen, well, I do hope you feel better now. If you sincerely believe Mr. Horn was wrong and you have any desire whatsoever to share your opinion, it is welcome here. Obviously, there is disagreement about the events in Pasadena and one of the primary purposes of this forum is to allow people to discuss and debate them.

    If indeed you are Mr. Southworth’s granddaughter, then you are close to a shooting situation and have insight as a family member. However, you won’t change any minds or elicit sympathy for your opinion by telling those you disagree with their position is illegitimate. Also, give Mr. Southworth our best regards as I am sure he has not had an easy time of it.

  87. texpat on December 4th, 2007 at 2:12 pm

    #49 fink1

    I read the Chronicle every day for many years and I am quite familiar with the placement of the Falkenberg column. The glaring problem here is the online staff did nothing to clarify the column as commentary. There are many readers of this site who do not live in the Houston area, much less in Texas. I live across the Hudson River from NYC so my access to a print version is nil. The Chronicle is frequently cited by other newspapers and websites across the nation and one would think those types of distinctions would be a high priority.

  88. Shannon on December 4th, 2007 at 2:36 pm

    # texpat Says:
    December 4th, 2007 at 9:20 am

    #9 Shannon

    Just tried to call you to ask that question. Are you saying it is in the editorial section or is it Texpat,
    treated as a main news story ? Does it have “commentary” in the headline area ?

    Sorry, I got busy and haven’t been following this thread. To (hopefully) answer your questions:

    Falkenberg’s inane opinions are featured regularly in a column that appears on the front page/ left-hand column / top-of-the-page of the City-State-Editorial Section of the print edition.

    I have never seen her column appear on the front page (Section A, page 1) of the print edition—which was the case in the internet edition this morning.

    Fixed. And you didn’t even vote for me. LST Moderator

  89. Shannon on December 4th, 2007 at 2:37 pm

    Com’ on HAL, end the blockquotes where they are supposed to end.

  90. texan1953 on December 4th, 2007 at 3:00 pm

    Someone help me out. Does Quanell the 10th still charge $3,500 for his outrage? As far as the Chron goes…unless you have a bird cage, there just isn’t any need for it.

  91. american woman on December 4th, 2007 at 3:05 pm

    Mrs. Horn has stated these burglaries have happened before and they are sick and tired of it. I would be too.

  92. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 3:09 pm

    Most importantly, Miguel Antonio DeJesus, 38, and Diego Ortiz, 30, both of Houston, would still be alive?

    Does anyone know the legal status of the dead perps? Has that been disclosed?

  93. Shannon on December 4th, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    88
    Thank you.

  94. american woman on December 4th, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    #92 nope nothing disclosed. I bet it wouldn’t take a reporter who really cared, but half a day to find out. Everything is hush hush.

  95. american woman on December 4th, 2007 at 3:37 pm

    Did any of you catch the AP story on this from radio news. They said the riot had hundreds from both sides. umm I think Quanell the fool had about what, 10-12 and Mr. Horn had about 300-500….. not exactly an even match. hehe

  96. hamous on December 4th, 2007 at 3:55 pm

    I’ve heard they were Columbian in one report and Puerto Rican in another. If the latter is true obviously they were American citizens.

  97. american woman on December 4th, 2007 at 4:06 pm

    I didn’t hear either of those two countries.

  98. Lawrence C. on December 4th, 2007 at 4:58 pm

    VISUALIZE WHIRLED PEAS! This young lady mentions “old west entitlement”. Perhaps she should focus on the “new west entitlement” - you know, the one entitling any old criminal who decides he wants your(or your neighbor’s) stuff more than you do, or any of the long list of entitlements our inept government has bestowed on a non-productive portion of the electorate at the expense of the productive taxpayer. Yes, Lisa, please enlighten your readership to the “new west entitlement”. I’ll be patiently waiting.

  99. texpat on December 4th, 2007 at 6:12 pm

    #98 LC

    No wisecracks from the Oak Forest crowd. We know what a bunch of trigger-happy yahoos they are.

  100. theamericanway on December 4th, 2007 at 6:39 pm

    the penalty for stealing is not death. if you think it should be you are ANTI AMERICAN and belong in iran or saudi arabia.

  101. american woman on December 4th, 2007 at 6:43 pm

    We used to hang horse thieves.

  102. fat albert on December 4th, 2007 at 6:57 pm

    101 -

    Apparently you haven’t been listening. The two thieves were not penalized. There was no sentence, or conviction. Joe Horn saw two thieves stealing from his neighbor. He called the police, and then, at some personal risk he attempted to stop them from committing felonious acts. When he felt personally threatened, he acted to defend himself.

    If American ever becomes a place where this scenario cannot happen then I won’t want to live here anymore, and it will no longer be America.

  103. american woman on December 4th, 2007 at 6:59 pm

    fat albert……. I am with you! I was just pointing out, we used to hang horse thieves. Mr. Horn is my hero. #100 is the one who is saying we are unamerican!

  104. fat albert on December 4th, 2007 at 7:02 pm

    AW - my bad, I meant 100.

  105. Dave D on December 4th, 2007 at 7:28 pm

    I just peeked in on the “Comical Blog” and it is Smokin’ 1094 comments 54 pages! 95% are normal folks that know right from wrong but there are a few IDIOTS that think the two THUGS were treated bad. Fasternu must have 100 comments? I only had one. It is sad that anyone that lives in this great country think that you should run from danger and let the Ba$tards go. When I was growing up, this would be a moot point.

  106. Simple Simon on December 4th, 2007 at 7:51 pm

    AW and FA,

    I suspect Mr Horn will stick to the defence theory that he felt threatened and had to respond.
    Shooting the two alleged thieves without a proper trial because they were thieves might not play well with the entire jury pool.

    I don’t think Mr Horn rises to my definition of a hero and I have known many. I believe heroes are men (or women) who risked their lives, when they could have played it safe, to save the lives of others.

    Mr Horn did risk his life to protect a pillowcase full of swag, but to me it just does not rise to the level, but we all have different standards. Still, I do believe that we (the people) should do more to protect ourselves from criminals. We cannot always rely on the police to stop criminals.

    Simple

  107. Golden Adam on December 4th, 2007 at 8:00 pm

    Legal questions…At what point do we find out where the “victims” fell? Is this public information? Do we have to wait for leaks? What is the time line for a grand jury investigation?

  108. southerntragedy on December 4th, 2007 at 8:02 pm

    theamericanway Says:
    December 4th, 2007 at 6:39 pm
    the penalty for stealing is not death. if you think it should be you are ANTI AMERICAN and belong in iran or saudi arabia.

    As to agree with fat alberts 102 comment, but to compare it to living in Iran or Saudi Arabia is hysterical.

    As for Cold Pizza, if you are truly Southworth’s granddaughter, I must think that your grandparents would not be proud of your comments and I am so glad that you are not my neighbor.

    As a matter of fact, since I live close to the hood, I just may point out your comments to your grandparents and get the whole story. Afterall, this is a public blog. If you are a troll, you will be exposed to the sunlight.

  109. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 8:06 pm

    Simple

    When we raise our children we set boundaries. If no boundaries are set what happens? What happens when society has no boundaries or they arent enforced? Just look at the border to see what happens. Crime is out of control which is a biproduct of no boundaries.

  110. Golden Adam on December 4th, 2007 at 8:07 pm

    #106, simple, Well stated. About 15 seconds after the final shot, Horn tells the operator that police are on the scene. Albeit a day late and a dollar short.

    This is a fascinating set of circumstances. I don’t think anyone can honestly say that he was “right” to leave the relative safety of his home. I think the question is whether or not he was “justified.”

  111. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 8:09 pm

    I predict he wont be indicted.

  112. Golden Adam on December 4th, 2007 at 8:11 pm

    #111…First two rapid shots-No Bill. 3rd and final shot, he’s got some explaining to do.

  113. Golden Adam on December 4th, 2007 at 8:12 pm

    Autopsy reports will tell me how to stand here.

  114. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 8:13 pm

    2nd shot grazed…needed a third. He was scared!

  115. Golden Adam on December 4th, 2007 at 8:19 pm

    No, I think that the first 2 shots were aimed at the same guy and both hit. The 3rd shot was aimed at the second guy. There was about a 10 second lag between the first to shots and the 3rd. It takes a little time to acquire a second target. This is where I need more information.

  116. southerntragedy on December 4th, 2007 at 8:19 pm

    Golden Adam Says:
    December 4th, 2007 at 8:11 pm
    #111…First two rapid shots-No Bill. 3rd and final shot, he’s got some explaining to do.

    It was a shotgun. As far as I know, it gets 2 shots at the most and had to reload. But then again, I’m just a girl.

  117. Golden Adam on December 4th, 2007 at 8:26 pm

    #116, ST, I doubt that this was a double barrel shotgun. That would be too “Wild West” as some would like to frame this. Many hold up to 8 rounds.

  118. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 8:31 pm

    He pumped it. DBs arent pumps.

    I am saying he downed e’m as if skeet shootin and went back to the perp that was still a threat.

    No Bill!

  119. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 8:32 pm

    ST

    Thanks for lunch. I had a blast. It was great seeing ya’ll. You are way more than just-a-girl.

    No Bill!

  120. Golden Adam on December 4th, 2007 at 8:36 pm

    #118…I understand your scenario better now. I get what you are saying. Hadn’t thought about it in that way.

  121. gadboy on December 4th, 2007 at 8:36 pm

    I came into this a little late, but here is my opinion. The article was great because it make you think. He told the dispatcher “They are not going to get away with this” There goes any argument that he feared for his life. He just took it upon himself to be judge, jury, and executioner.

  122. Golden Adam on December 4th, 2007 at 8:39 pm

    #118…I still can’t get passed the fact that someone was “down the street”…escaping. No Bill on the first. Finishing the job will be left to the jury…which will be hung. I need more facts!!!

  123. southerntragedy on December 4th, 2007 at 8:45 pm

    #117: AH! See? Didn’t know that. I only have the double barrel shotgun. You men seem to need all the bells and whistles.

    Hopefully we’ll find out what kind of shotgun that he actually had. Being 61, I’m likely to think that he had had it since he was 12.

    DJ: Great to see ya again! Been quite a while and you are most welcome! NO BILL!

    /call me a redneck if ya must. Quannel surely did!

    I was listening to the Michael Berry show on the way home from work when “Chris” the Quannel side posse called in. He claimed that the people who showed up in the counter protest called Quannel numerous names. Michael said from the video on his blog was the complete opposite. I had phoned in to dispute the video that Deep Purple had supplied, and the screener said that there was a 59? minute uncut version as well, with Quannel being the racist. Since Chris was part of the “posse”, he claimed that it was edited. Afterall, HE was there. Anyone see the video on Michael Berry’s blog? I asked him if it was the one posted here, but he was unsure. I’ve got dial-up.

  124. Golden Adam on December 4th, 2007 at 8:45 pm

    On the tape, Horn mentions the Castle Doctrine and the date it went into effect. He knew the law…and exercised his rights under the law. Was he right? No. Was he justified under the law? Probably, pending autopsy reports.

  125. southerntragedy on December 4th, 2007 at 8:52 pm

    gadboy Says:
    December 4th, 2007 at 8:36 pm
    I came into this a little late, but here is my opinion. The article was great because it make you think. He told the dispatcher “They are not going to get away with this” There goes any argument that he feared for his life. He just took it upon himself to be judge, jury, and executioner.

    Us rednecks like to think of it as defending our’s and our neighbor’s property, and being put into a position that NONE of wanted to be in. He told them to stop, hopefully to hold them until the police showed up (just like I woulda done, but I mighta not thought to call 911 first) but it sounds like that they didn’t. INNOCENT until proven guilty, eh, Gaddy? That’s the American way, shuug! You know me. Would you condemn me too?

  126. southerntragedy on December 4th, 2007 at 8:52 pm

    OOOH! Quannel 10 is on Hannity and Colmes right now!

  127. GoodJobTim on December 4th, 2007 at 8:54 pm

    #106
    Simple

    Spoken as an elitist moderate would, how many sides can you take on an issue?

  128. DanielJames on December 4th, 2007 at 8:58 pm

    It is always sad when human life is lost. It is more sad when people are afraid all the time because of thugs running amok. I must side with Mr Horn. He manned up when most would shiver and cower.

  129. gadboy on December 4th, 2007 at 9:00 pm

    I’d be over there helping you protect your property, but that is another story.

  130. GoodJobTim on December 4th, 2007 at 9:02 pm

    #123
    ST

    Yeah, same video, it is 10 minutes (I think) uncut.

  131. hamous on December 4th, 2007 at 9:03 pm

    Most shotgun (pump or automatic) can hold three shells. There is a plug that can be removed so it will hold five but normally it is illegal to hunt with the plug removed. Goose hunting around here is an exception.

  132. Golden Adam on December 4th, 2007 at 9:04 pm