Top
Comments
20 Responses to “UpChuck’s bigoted, sexist emails emerge”
  1. american woman on January 8th, 2008 at 6:02 pm

    I don’t like him, but am not comfortable with us going through his emails. Big brother will be reading all our emails, if we aren’t careful.

  2. Fasternu 426 on January 8th, 2008 at 6:15 pm

    ~( 8(l) DO’H

  3. Phil_M on January 8th, 2008 at 6:45 pm

    Well, that sure didn’t take very long.

    I bet it will be an interesting evening at the Siegler household as well.

    Thankfully, we still have Jim Leitner.

  4. Bannable Lecturer on January 8th, 2008 at 6:50 pm

    Phil

    Its always “interesting” at the Sieglers

  5. David Benzion on January 8th, 2008 at 6:51 pm

    My understanding, fwiw, is that this merely the tinniest tip of a very big iceberg.

  6. texpat on January 8th, 2008 at 6:55 pm

    #1 AW

    When you are a public official, it is not appropriate to use government computers and e-mail for personal purposes. There are many alternatives. As a matter of record, anything contained in a communication generated on a government computer is public information with certain narrow exceptions.

  7. Phil_M on January 8th, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    David - The Al Jolson quote was serious. You ain’t seen nothin yet.

  8. Phil_M on January 8th, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    #4 - So I hear.

  9. NAT PIERCE on January 8th, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    Full disclosure: I do not like Rosenthal.

    This iceberg tip is juvenile if one intends to make credible case against Rosenthal and not be rendered to the flamer section of the bleachers should pace their rhetoric.

  10. The Reformed One on January 8th, 2008 at 7:39 pm

    Kudos to LST for their coverage of this story.

    LST is The Reformed Blog!

  11. american woman on January 8th, 2008 at 7:50 pm

    I know the rules Texpat, and I am not condoning any campaign work he did. I am not in the situation to have a company computer. But, I am betting the majority of folks get emails from friends at their work address. I just think it’s petty to publish his private email, along with his emails that pertain to offense. There’s a moral aspect to this. He can be investigated, and found to have abused and broken laws, but to make his private email public is just not necessary.

  12. The Reformed One on January 8th, 2008 at 7:51 pm

    Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time!

  13. slash on January 8th, 2008 at 8:13 pm

    What kind of porn was it? Gay? Kiddie? Fetish? It makes a difference . . .

    :-D

    That being said, ya can’t much hammer someone when they are SENT, well, anything. Now, if ya FORWARD that inappropriate tidbit, yer backside SHOULD be in a sling.

    Which could be bondage.

    We only have “ourselves” to blame; someone is electing these idiots.

  14. texpat on January 8th, 2008 at 8:28 pm

    #11 AW

    There are millions of Americans who use their company e-mail for personal purposes. Most of them work for private sector companies who don’t really care about it. When someone works for the government it is an entirely different set of rules. As citizens we own the land, building, desks, light fixtures, computers, servers, files and every other thing in those facilities. The product of all those public employees is our property, not theirs. If Rosenthal chose to record his personal communications on government computers, it is his problem, not ours.

    There have been circumstances when I did consulting work for others, in their offices, utilizing their computer systems. I never used the e-mail accounts I had there for any personal application. I always used either a separate computer (my own) or accessed a personal email account from the web to conduct any personal business. I never wanted there to be a conflict of interest, or the appearance thereof, with other clients, customers or personal contacts. Most of all, I wanted to avoid a record of my personal business collected onto somebody else’s backup system.

    Is this so difficult to expect from an elected official ? I think not.

  15. NAT PIERCE on January 8th, 2008 at 8:44 pm

    and now back to the real world…

  16. GoodJobTim on January 8th, 2008 at 9:31 pm

    I agree Nat and AW, childish.

  17. Phil_M on January 8th, 2008 at 10:22 pm

    It’s already getting worse. Watermelon and KFC jokes from the guy who puts more black perps on death row than any other prosecutor in the country…

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/us/09texas.html?ref=us

    Other material that was in Mr. Rosenthal’s e-mail but did not contain his name was a photograph, titled “Fatal Overdose,” of a black man lying on a sidewalk amid watermelon peels and Kentucky Fried Chicken containers.

  18. Zippy_Slug on January 8th, 2008 at 11:37 pm

    good god man.. use a private line.. or don’t be such an f-up.. :P

    He’s still running for re-election?

  19. taulds on January 9th, 2008 at 1:09 am
  20. navymom on January 9th, 2008 at 9:33 am

    Geez, they are just emails. I am betting most of the population has gotten similarly risue emails, if not worse. They are just emails, meant to be private.

    There are bigger issues to worry about.

    Lets hope no one goes through YOUR email!! How many of you would be up sh*t creek w/o a paddle?

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom