Top
Comments
20 Responses to “Michael Ramirez”
  1. Dov on April 8th, 2008 at 9:17 am

    Is there a print of it on ebay yet ? Congratulations Michael.

  2. Adee on April 8th, 2008 at 9:34 am

    Ah, the elegance of simplicity driven deep into the bull’s eye. Congrats Michael on that, and on your badge of honor at being canned by LAT. Now you can wave your Pulitzer at them.

  3. FourAlarm on April 8th, 2008 at 10:20 am

    Wave it at them? I’d crown them with it.

    (”Crown” being an olde timey term meaning ‘brain’ them with it)

    (”Brain” being an olde timey term meaning ’strike’ them on the head)

  4. dowjones4k on April 8th, 2008 at 10:46 am

    does the chronicle warn you before banning you?

  5. T-Hawkk on April 8th, 2008 at 10:58 am

    Don’t like it. Don’t like any cartoons. Don’t think he should be recognized with any kind of award.

    Cartoons are for 6-year-olds.

  6. Meglet on April 8th, 2008 at 11:02 am

    I LOVE IT!!! I’d pay $10 for one of those!!! :mrgreen:

  7. David Benzion on April 8th, 2008 at 1:17 pm

    #5 T-Hawkk

    I agree.

    But what really gets me are these talkie motion pictures, with color.

    If I want to see something in color, I’ll look out my window.

    And preacher’s sermon on Sunday is plenty yapping for my ears, thank you very much.

    ;)

  8. Shannon on April 8th, 2008 at 1:28 pm

    An interesting history tracing political cartooning back to Leonardo Da Vinci and Martin Luther/The Reformation:

    http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA96/PUCK/part1.html

    Politics would be so much less interesting without political cartoons. I suppose there are those without appreciation for satire. I am glad I am not one of them.

  9. texpat on April 8th, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    #5 T-Hawkk

    You are one of the rare breed who recognizes irony, satire and parody are useless diversionary devices foisted upon us by sinister forces obsessed with our destruction. Vigilance, eternal vigilance…

  10. Shannon on April 8th, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    An interesting piece tracing political cartooning back to Leonardo Da Vinci and Martin Luther and the Reformation.

    http://xroads.virginia.edu/~MA96/PUCK/part1.html

  11. Shannon on April 8th, 2008 at 1:42 pm

    Death to HAL!!

  12. duhmoose on April 8th, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    I like Martin Luther, he had spunk.

  13. FourAlarm on April 8th, 2008 at 2:56 pm

    Here’s looking at you, Shannon…

    http://76.30.250.37/HAL9000.jpg

  14. Adee on April 8th, 2008 at 3:33 pm

    #11, Take a stress pill, Shannon. He he he.
    #13, Watch it, HAL.

    #3 FourAlarm, Wouldn’t want to chance damaging the Pulitzer, like denting it.

    #10 Shannon, Speaking of Martin Luther, one of his complaints nailed to the church door was the practice of Simony, selling indulgences. Martin Luther would find Al Gore’s carbon credit scheme equally bad and equivalent to selling indulgences.
    Interesting theme for a cartoon: Martin nailing carbon credits to the church door.

  15. pimlico on April 8th, 2008 at 9:04 pm

    Cartoons are interesting. It’s surprising how some of them cam be so myopic and of the mark.

  16. KRogers on April 8th, 2008 at 9:16 pm

    I have to agree, somewhat, with #15. Ramirez was the editorial cartoonist for the school paper (University of California, Irvine–back in the 80’s) and I was none too happy when he drew a not-at-all-flattering cartoon of me. Of course now I could probably sell it on ebay (of course I STILL have it–it is good to be a pack rat).

  17. T-Hawkk on April 8th, 2008 at 10:13 pm

    Oh, I “get” the cartoon drawing alright… Financial reporters think any little bit of turbulance in the economic news means we’re all going to die. That financial reporters overreact to even a little bad news….

    I still think its pathetic for a grown man to make black and white cartoon drawings.

    Cartoons are for 6-year-olds.

  18. texpat on April 8th, 2008 at 10:49 pm

    #17 T-Hawkk

    Vigilance…eternal vigilance…

  19. FourAlarm on April 9th, 2008 at 12:10 am

    And Trix is for kids.
    (They still make that stuff?)

  20. TexasRep on April 11th, 2008 at 12:34 pm

    “Michael was born in 1961 to a Mexican-American father and Japanese-American mother.”

    Isn’t that un american? The hyphens?

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom