Top
Comments
36 Responses to “Obama inspires Middle America”
  1. american woman on April 11th, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    I don’t know about the folk in Pennsylvania, but this Texas gal clings to her religion and her gun every time Obama opens his mouth.

  2. tedtam on April 11th, 2008 at 4:51 pm

    What an egocentric, self-centered jackbutt.

  3. T-Hawkk on April 11th, 2008 at 5:02 pm

    Hussein Obama is a piece of garbage.

    “….they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment…as a way to explain their frustrations’… ”

    This guy is so un-American it’s pathetic.

    He does not understand this country at all…

    Typical leftist - too much time drinking $6 latte’s and reading Marx.

  4. Al Williams on April 11th, 2008 at 5:13 pm

    yeeee haaaaw!!! (bang bang bang bang)(that was me shooting a gun)

  5. tedtam on April 11th, 2008 at 5:18 pm

    There once was black man, Obama,
    Who blamed his racist views on grandmama,
    He cannot conceive,
    That others believe
    In different ideals, causing him trauma.

    He looks down his nose at the “common folk,”
    Whose class envy he attempts to provoke,
    For life is zero-sum,
    And it’s the rich who have won,
    But it is “poor” that his policies will choke.

  6. american woman on April 11th, 2008 at 5:30 pm

    Excellent Tedtam! Pretty much sums it up.

  7. David Benzion on April 11th, 2008 at 5:31 pm

    Ivy League schooled Barry Hussein,
    Had P.C.-crap poured into his brain,
    For President he runs,
    ‘Dissing religion and guns,
    After losing, racism they’ll blame!

  8. american woman on April 11th, 2008 at 5:36 pm

    Such talent at LST…….

  9. David Benzion on April 11th, 2008 at 5:37 pm

    tedtam inspired my Muse…

  10. sargevining on April 11th, 2008 at 6:10 pm

    Me?

    I’m just a typical bitter white person clinging to my guns and my religion going after immigrants and free trade to make myself feeel better.

    But it’s all Geroge Bush and Bill Clinton’s fault.

    Until this fall.

    That’s when I’m supposed to be frightened to death that John McCain will do it to me and vote for Obama so he can protect me from the Republicans who use fear to govern us.

    It’s a NEW kind of politics doncha know.

  11. Robert M on April 11th, 2008 at 6:41 pm

    Yeah, “BO” will use all his business experience to help generate jobs for our country. He’s such a great “problem solver”. His charisma will be more than enough to make people feel great. What a bunch of HOOEY!!!!! The man is all talk, no action, no experience to generate any action. He promises what you want, change but the kind of change he is offering is only HOPE!!!!! And only HOPE!!!!

  12. DeepPurple on April 11th, 2008 at 7:04 pm

    megalomaniac

  13. FourAlarm on April 11th, 2008 at 7:10 pm

    I want to see a picture of him in some swim trunks. There just HAS to be a square peg hole in his back where a large key gets inserted to wind this jackass up and a pull ring that, when yanked, cycles through selections of absolute dribble.

  14. hamous on April 11th, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    …the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them.

    Really? Someone should tell Pennsylvania Democrat Governor Ed Rendell the bad news:

    HARRISBURG – Governor Edward G. Rendell said today Pennsylvania’s unemployment rate has dropped to a level not seen since the 1970s and its economy continued to add jobs in March, setting a record high for the ninth consecutive month.

    The statewide unemployment rate dropped two-tenths-of-a-percentage-point to 3.8 percent, hitting a 30-year low. The March rate was eight-tenths-of-a-point below the March 2006 rate, and six-tenths-of-a-point below the national rate of 4.4 percent.

    In the words of Charlie Daniels, Watch him boys he’s a thoroughly dangerous man!

  15. sargevining on April 11th, 2008 at 7:43 pm

    Obama doesn’t sell Hope.

    He sells a remarkbly grim picture of America and Americans, which is deeply rooted in the beliefs of his racist Anti-American church. Then, after he’s gotten you convinced that it all sucks, he tells you that if you elect him, you can have Hope.

  16. TEX06 on April 11th, 2008 at 9:30 pm

    Obama is just your typical baby aborting, pervert loving, God mocking, commie traitor dog — in other words — your typical democrat politician!

  17. slash on April 11th, 2008 at 9:42 pm

    Please, PLEASE keep talking, BHO. Keep talking, everyone is listening. I have several older “peacenick” friends that bought into his line of poo before the primary, but I’ve been emailing them links to Youtube, and this sight, showing them what he’s really like. They are slowly (and some not so slowly) coming around.

    I still think we should write in Ted Nugent!

  18. hamous on April 11th, 2008 at 11:15 pm

    And the Democrats are pissed. Not because they think what he said is bad, but that he’s revealed one of their dirty little secrets - they really do feel that way:

    “It comes off very badly,” Democratic strategist Kirsten Powers said of Obama’s small-town America remarks. “They are things that I think in a liberal world sound totally normal, and outside of that world I don’t know that he appreciates how it sounds. And it just sounds very elitist, and it sounds like he’s looking down on people.”

    http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/11/obama-draws-fire-for-comments-on-small-town-america/

  19. sargevining on April 11th, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    Good comments abound at Hot air tonite on multiple posts. My favorite, after he tried to change the subject to scary old John McCain:

    http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/11/obama-tries-to-change-the-subject-im-out-of-touch/

    What a pig this dude is turning out to be, he doesn’t discard his filth, he rolls around in it and tries to convince everyone that it’s sweet.

    Verbal Abuse on April 11, 2008 at 9:46 PM

    and once again, VDH is in my head:

    http://mt.pajamasmedia.com/xpress/victordavishanson/

    Comment on another “Barack Blak Pastro Flap” (number three for those of you keeping score), this one who made anti-semetic remarks at an MLK Day Rally:

    First, once Obama failed to condemn Wright and offered contextualization, the flood gates of extremism were thrown wide open. Now any hate-monger, it seems, can go on a public racist rant, with the expectation that there will be no credible and absolute public condemnation. You see, our potential next President has already weighed in on Rev. Wright’s hate speech by citing his past good works, the commonality of such talk among all our religious figures, the special nature of the black church, and the unfair snippets that are replayed—all of which, of course, will offer the same “context” of mitigation for the Eric Lee hatred. We can imagine the accolades to come in the next few days concerning Lee’s public benefactions.

    Second, when one collates what Wright, Meeks, Lee, and Sharpton have said, and then compares those “snippets” and “loops” with the cheery characterization of the unique protocols of the black church by Obama, then one realizes that the public is supposed to accept that African-American pastors are exempt from the sort of no-go speech zones that everyone else rightly accepts. It seems that we are rapidly reaching a sort of scary situation in which the black pastor will say whatever he wishes, no matter how anti-Semitic and racist, and then almost dare anyone to challenge that hatred, knowing that his congregation will support him, African-American intellectuals will contextualize him on television, and politicians like Obama (cf. Hillary’s past hugs of Sharpton) will defend him.

    Three, these incidents will only continue until someone of stature in the civil rights community issues a zero-tolerance speech of the sort Obama should have given but failed at. In isolation, each subsequent outburst is explicable; in the aggregate they paint a picture of a deep-seeded racism and hatred that have been encouraged by the absence of any censure—the appeasement that we know so well from the Obama/Wright controversy.

    Things are going to get worse when they televise Reverend Wright’s speech to the NAACP coming up.

    That’s right, they INVITED him to speak.

  20. sargevining on April 11th, 2008 at 11:32 pm

    It suddenly occurs to me the big mistake the Leftist supporters of Brack Obama are making here.

    They are supposing that he is uniquely suited to be thier standard bearer because of his ethnicity, and have plans to shout “Racist!” at each and every opportunity—large or small, real or imagined—to give him cover and get him elected. Always looking for unchallengable moral authority by trotting out Cindy Sheehan’s motherhood or 9/11 widow’s loss, they now think they can do it with Barack’s blackness.

    What they may not be counting on are the number of people in this country who are sick and frikkin tired of being called a racist simply because they are caucasian.

  21. dowjones4k on April 12th, 2008 at 7:10 am

    the 3 candidates we have to choose from are inspiring people to stay home.

  22. sargevining on April 12th, 2008 at 7:27 am

    from a guy who’s name is pooponrepubs in another forum, it’s not surprising you’d want to keep people from the pols by echoing the same dark vision of America that Obama does.

  23. dowjones4k on April 12th, 2008 at 7:39 am

    sarge i will vote and probably for Mc Cain. The republicans will not run people that at least try to conform to their platform. they make no effort. i know it is the money from the lobbyists that drive our choices but some of these choices are rinos and i wont vote for many of them - skip the box.

  24. GoodJobTim on April 12th, 2008 at 7:42 am

    The comments to the article are just as worrisome as one radical politician spouting this stuff.

  25. american woman on April 12th, 2008 at 7:50 am

    Ah but GJT, he is not just one radical politician, This man wants to be the most powerful man in the world. Harry Reid is a radical politician. Obama’s history, which we are supposed to ignore, tells us this man is not who he is selling us he is. Like Big45 says, buy ammo.

  26. sargevining on April 12th, 2008 at 7:51 am

    The comment is snoballing trough the blogosphere. It’s on audio, so that mean’s that it’s going to be a very large snowball by the time it gets put on campaign commercials in October.

    The only real question is will folks try to cram it in with the racist statements of Reverend Wright and the homophobic statements of Reverend meeks and the anti-semetic statements of Rev. Lee (which would make for a pretty long commercial anyway), or is this good enough for a stand alone commercial?

    Commentary is pretty consistent, my favorite so far is Ace of Spades HQ who also has video of Obama trying to change the subject to scaring people with John McCain:

    http://ace.mu.nu/archives/260003.php

    To be honest that vid isn’t as good as Allah’s deconstruction of it. Pay attention to Obama’s attempt to limit the “gaffe” to calling people “bitter.”

    Dude, that’s the least of it and you know it. You came thisclose to saying “Religion is the opiate of the masses.” You strongly implied that people “cling to their religion” only due to economic desperation, and not out of faith at all.

    Allah and I were emailing about this and I said, “Well, you know, they all think that. It’s the What’s the Matter With Kansas? theory that has such a grip on the liberal mindset. They can’t comprehend why people aren’t gung-ho for socialism, so they postulate that people are ‘distracted’ and ‘divided’ by sinister forces injecting ‘phony issues’ (like God) into politics to keep them from voting for socialism.”

    Which is, yes, itself pretty much just a re-wording of “Religion is the opiate of the masses.”

    Will this hurt Obama? I doubt it, as far as the primaries go. Because, once again: Almost all liberals believe this. Obama was just stupid enough to say it before a primary.

    Wanna know why Republicans don’t run the most conservative candidates that they can find?

    Lookm at the candidates the Delomcrats run. Republicans dont need the most Conservative Presidential Candidate they can find to beat either one of them. One is a crook and a pathological liar, the other is an elitist Socialist who doesn’thave any respect for the people who’s votes he needs so he spends all of his time selling them soap.

    When I shot a lot of pool, I noticed that I played better against good players, and not so well agains poor ones.

    The Republicans are just playing up to thier competition.

  27. american woman on April 12th, 2008 at 7:58 am

    #26 Sarge, Republicans may not need the most conservative candidate, but what is an election about? Is it a game of chess……… and f*** the country and people? Or, is it a party trying to give the citizens the best possible choice? I’m supposed to be proud of republicans, who must be saving their best horse for another race? That’s ridiculous. Let me ask one question. With a liberal congress, how best is our country served, by a moderate republican president, or a conservative republican president?

  28. Adee on April 12th, 2008 at 8:13 am

    Barack, keep on yappin’ sans script. It is entertaining to count the ways he can stick his foot/feet in his mouth and subsequently watch him pry them out–with the help of hangers on and willing media accomplices. Each gaffe and resultant spin provides instant ammunition for Hillary’s camp, which is a positive point in keeping the battle raging in the Dem camp until Denver.

    Then of course there’s the Hillary/Bill selection of gaffes for the Obama campaign arsenal. Watching this ping-pong match is great theater. The downside to the merriment is they aren’t running for school council president.

    Meantime, the McCain camp has a great selection from both sides delivered on a platter to deposit in the memory bank. And when a particularly insulting one rockets by, a well-modulated zinger delivered immediately has the desired effect. Can’t pass up a hanging curve ball very often.

  29. sargevining on April 12th, 2008 at 8:17 am

    With a liberal congress, how best is our country served, by a moderate republican president, or a conservative republican president?

    A Moderate President isn’t a real problem.

    A Liberal Congress is.

    A Moderate President can temper the excesses of both sides of the aisle. I tend to favor that.

  30. sargevining on April 12th, 2008 at 8:18 am

    Power line has the audio:

    http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/04/020274.php

    (so does Huffpo, but we don;t want to raise thier hit count)

    Micheal goldfarb told us before this come out how Obama spins stuff like this:

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2008/03/obama_its_all_a_distraction.asp

  31. Simple Simon on April 12th, 2008 at 8:34 am

    Folks in glass houses….never heard any condecending remarks here.

    Simple

  32. Adee on April 12th, 2008 at 9:22 am

    Umm, Simple Simon, nobody here is running for POTUS.

  33. Mike S on April 12th, 2008 at 10:32 am

    #14 -

    Since those comments a year ago, the PA governor has said this on the state’s economy and the latest rise in unemployment rates to 4.9 percent:

    “While Pennsylvania’s economic picture has been a positive one thus far, we do have concerns about the national economy and the negative impact it may have on our future growth.”

    Manufacturing groups though tend to agree with the more negative assement over the longer period, part of the continuing concern over the shift from a production to services base.

    “Since 2001, manufacturing employment in Pennsylvania has declined by 24.3 percent, a loss of 207,300 jobs. Not only are Pennsylvania’s manufacturing job losses considerably worse even than the record shattering U.S. figure of -19.7 percent, but only nine other states have experienced a greater percentage of losses. Moreover, Pennsylvania’s job losses from the worsening trade deficits with China doubled, from almost 40,000 in 2000 to near 80,000 in 2007, a loss of 40,000 jobs.”

    http://www.reliableplant.com/article.asp?pagetitle=Manufacturing%20job%20losses%20cripple%20growth%20in%20Pennsylvania&articleid=11398

  34. KRogers on April 12th, 2008 at 6:10 pm

    4.9% unemployment?!?!! Do you realize that that number used to be the “gold standard” for “full employment”, that is, everyone who wants to be working is working? The sky is NOT falling!

    Has anyone heard about the New Republic article from last spring that claims J. Wright is a former muslim?

    With John Sidney McCain III (using everyone’s full name to be fair) at least you get “strict constructionist” judges, victory in Iraq, and disdain for earmarks, but if you can’t vote for him, vote for the REST of the Republicans all the way down the ballot! I agree with Sarge #29, that if we let Congress go we’re in DEEP trouble.

  35. azrael on April 13th, 2008 at 8:39 pm

    Possibly moree interesting than what obama said was
    where he said it. In a mansion where the media was excluded

    We really were not meant to hear these comments. They were addressed to the superior like minded individuals at this intimate gathering. Just between our rulres to be.

    http://www.zombietime.com/obama_visits_billionaires_row/

  36. texan1953 on April 14th, 2008 at 12:25 pm

    With BHO’s remarks…telling the “beautiful people” in San Fran behind closed doors what’s wrong with fly-over country…speaks volumes about him and his supporters. This is what the Democratic Party thinks of anyone the isn’t with them. After this latest flap with BHO…voting Democrat is another nail in America’s coffin. There is no way a rational, thoughtful person can vote for the Democratic Candidate for President.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom