Top
Comments
30 Responses to “Senate’s Bailout Bill Heavy With Unrelated Amendments”
  1. american woman on October 1st, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    What do we do? These people are incorrigible. Do they have no redeeming qualities? I am just astounded at their audacity as we keep saying NO.

  2. hamous on October 1st, 2008 at 3:08 pm

    Enough is enough!

  3. carbon-credit on October 1st, 2008 at 3:16 pm

    The American political system in all its glory…

    What a sham…

  4. wagonburner on October 1st, 2008 at 3:29 pm

    This is something tailor made for McCain to LOUDLY denounce.

  5. Local Yankee on October 1st, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    No one is sufficiently intelligent to comprehend what all is included in the bill. So this is how our glorious Senate works.

  6. Katfish on October 1st, 2008 at 3:32 pm

    #4 - We can only PRAY that McCain puts a big ole BUG in Mrs Palin’s ear to do JUST THAT and TONIGHT!

  7. raiderdav on October 1st, 2008 at 3:40 pm

    To be fair, a lot of those items listed above are just extensions of effective dates of existing legislation - they aren’t just about spending earmarks.

  8. friendly mike on October 1st, 2008 at 3:40 pm

    The pertinent question here is which Senator put in which earmarks. Please don’t tell me it can be done anonymously. Honestly, we need to find this out, if anyone knows how.

    Horror of horrors, what if McCain himself put some in?

  9. Smacktle on October 1st, 2008 at 3:46 pm

    I have never been so pi$$ed at our elected officials. They are operating under somebody elses mandate, not the peoples. We need to flush the bowl democrats and repubs alike.

  10. pimlico on October 1st, 2008 at 3:49 pm

    It’s time for a LINE ITEM VOTE for all appropriations.
    Maybe Nancy Pelosi could give back her money from the Government for her Vineyard. ( she could make up for it by selling ‘milk’ to Ben and Jerry’s.)

  11. wagonburner on October 1st, 2008 at 3:55 pm

    #10 pimlico
    It would take a Constitutional Amendment for that. Not that I’m opposed to it (I am much in favor), but the USSC ruled it unconstitutional in the ’90s.

  12. Shannon on October 1st, 2008 at 3:55 pm

    #8 fmike.
    McCain has never submitted an earmark.
    I doubt he would start now.

  13. american woman on October 1st, 2008 at 3:58 pm

    Raiderdav, perhaps that is so, however it appears to me these extensions are purchased yes votes by Representatives that want these things continued. IF this is a crisis larger than any we have experienced in my life time, then we need a bill with items that pertain ONLY TO THIS ISSUE. These Congressmen/women, sicken me.

  14. bob42 on October 1st, 2008 at 4:05 pm

    As to who put in the pork, I figure there may be a correlation between the states that stand to benefit, and a senator that was originally against the bill.

    The house is not likely to have trouble passing “No Banker Left Behind, Part Deaux”

  15. Bonecrusher on October 1st, 2008 at 4:14 pm

    I can’t believe that I am actually agreeing with the smackster; flush the out and the sooner the better. Kevin Brady (Rino) the Woodlands needs to be defeated! VOTE FOR KENT HARGETT if you are tired of being serviced by Kevin Brady

  16. a crazy canuk on October 1st, 2008 at 4:21 pm

    #15: I heard Brady on the radio this a.m. He said he didn’t like but voted for it because it had to be passed. WTF? A bad bill should never be passed. It is like cutting off your leg because you have a sliver. It indicates to me that rather read and understand the bill, do what’s right, he chose the easy course vote yes and hope nobody notices. I think people noticed.

    There is a serious need for some chlorine in the Congressional/Senatorial pool.

  17. Custer Rushmore on October 1st, 2008 at 4:28 pm

    An ambulance with a critical patient rushes past only to pull in to the drive through of the Chinese restaurant to pick up some DIM SUM PORK …

  18. dustydi on October 1st, 2008 at 5:41 pm

    NOW is the time to pick up the telephone and scream, as Americans. They are forcing carbon credits down our throats. For the love of Pete, and your grandchildren, make at least two telephone calls right now.

  19. William Moore on October 1st, 2008 at 5:42 pm

    4&6
    Earlier today I heard Gov. Palin tell Hannity on his radio show that she and McCain are both for this turkey. She said (sounding to me as if she was reading from a prepared text) that the crisis has hit main street and middle American families and that “doing nothing” isn’t the solution. I’m losing faith in this ticket by the hour but there is nowhere to turn.

  20. raiderdav on October 1st, 2008 at 5:43 pm

    #13 Right - I agree with you on all that. Just wanted to clarify that these lists aren’t just pork spending items - some of them are even tax cut extensions.

    The whole system of bribing representatives for votes is disgusting to me and I wish there was some constitutional way to implement a line item veto to try and trim that fat.

  21. whitetop on October 1st, 2008 at 5:46 pm

    It is no wonder the country is so screwed up; the idiots we elect to Congress can not keep their eye on the ball long enough to deal with the issue at hand. Always have to be looking forward to the next votes they can get by providing goodies to those who don’t deserve them. It just shows they have no interest in really solving the problem. If they can’t have the 700 billion with no strings they will cloud the picture so bad no one knows what is going on. They certainly don’t in Washington DC.

    San Fran Nan has been caught with her fingers in the till giving her hubby money from her PAC fund. Apparently she favored the legislation to stop that kind of stuff and it passed the house but failed in the Senate. Guess that makes everything okay.

  22. Darren10 on October 1st, 2008 at 5:56 pm

    Centralization of finance. Let me repeat: that’s fascism.

  23. davewolfgang on October 1st, 2008 at 6:05 pm

    Is it time for some Tar and Feathers?

  24. southerntragedy on October 1st, 2008 at 6:06 pm

    Add note: When I attended the County Convention and almost break time, when Kevin Brady got up to speak, most of the room left. Did he take the hint that his own party wasn’t happy? I think not.

    Kevin Brady is a pudd. He voted against the anti-horse slaughter bill (that passed anyway) because he thought that only “old and decrepid” horses got slaughtered, and I let it go. Not this time.

  25. southerntragedy on October 1st, 2008 at 6:07 pm

    #23: Darn skippy. Either that, or stake them to fire ant piles. ;)

  26. davewolfgang on October 1st, 2008 at 6:10 pm

    Or is it time for some Tea…?

  27. William Moore on October 1st, 2008 at 6:15 pm

    25

    …or stake them to fire ant piles.

    Kinkyyyy. Sign here.–Hedley Lamarr

  28. american woman on October 1st, 2008 at 7:55 pm

    That wimpy, brown-nose, spineless excuse for a man, Lindsey Graham, with a quivering voice, is going to vote for this &^^& bill as it stands. What a puke.

    http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/01/kill-the-bailout-the-vote-draws-near/

  29. FourAlarm on October 1st, 2008 at 8:14 pm

    Where’s a Neutron Bomb when you really need one?

  30. klayman on October 1st, 2008 at 9:18 pm

    Apparantly our RINO senators have voted tonight to destroy America as we know it. Why should I vote for a Democrat who pretends to be a Republican when I can vote for a real Democrat? I will never vote for these traitors again as long as I live. I will vote for McCain reluctantly because I do not want a Facist, communist, socialist, white hating man with a racist wife in the white house, but I don’t care who is in the senate - look what happened to Bailout Bill. I wish I could spit in their face tonight

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom