Top
Comments
12 Responses to “Chron circulation falls dramatically in 2008”
  1. southerntragedy on October 27th, 2008 at 7:00 am

    Matt: I gave your comment OY a thumbs up. ;)

  2. slash on October 27th, 2008 at 7:47 am

    Also, don’t forget: birds are not as popular a pet as they used to be. That has to hurt. Freezer rap has improved and become cheaper. They have those new “puppy pads” that are much more absorbent. And although car re-painting has become quite common in the “barrio”, masking paper isn’t that hard to find or expensive. So, that leaves “window washers” at your favorite stoplight and . . . well, that leaves window washers.

    Besides, the Chron was so yellow, it was hard to tell when the puppy used it. Maybe they should go ahead, tip their hand, and print it in Spanish only.

  3. GriffithLea on October 27th, 2008 at 9:11 am

    WRT raising the price and reducing circulation: like all liberals, they think that prices (and taxes) can be raised infinitely. They really only need to sell one paper per year, for $100,000,000 .

  4. wfish on October 27th, 2008 at 9:38 am

    Most of a newspaper’s revenue is in the advertising. With the rates based on circulation, sounds to me like they own some pretty significiant refunds to current advertisers and will have a heck of a time trying to explain their annual rate increase. I see more layoffs in the future….they should start at the top if they really want to stop the bleeding, but of course, they won’t..

  5. Royko on October 27th, 2008 at 10:37 am

    Matt,

    Is there a linkage, some linear correlation, between the significant decline of Houston’s daily print “News Backbone” and the ridership decline of METREAUX’s boondoggle, unsafe, and unreliable “Transit Backbone” tram?

  6. southerntragedy on October 27th, 2008 at 12:01 pm

    Heeeeyyyyy….where’d all the comments go to the Chron article? Are they suppressin’ the people again?

  7. wfish on October 27th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    Not many folks care that the Chron’s circ is shrinking….nobody goes there anymore, so who cares? Interesting article and comments under today’s LST heading “Chronically Shamless”, which helps explain why the Hearston Chronicle keeps losing respect….and circulation.

  8. Big45Iron on October 27th, 2008 at 6:18 pm

    Who?

  9. texpat on October 27th, 2008 at 7:15 pm

    Houston’s Bleeding Information Source

    Bramanti rises to the occasion.

  10. american woman on October 27th, 2008 at 8:19 pm

    The Chronicle has become a liberal blog. It’s written for liberals, by liberals and is a nice tax write off for someone. Maybe the Hearst corp really doesn’t care about making a profit in Houston.

  11. wfish on October 28th, 2008 at 12:22 pm

    Hearst has deep pockets and they bought The Houston Chronicle as a “cash cow”. They thought this would be one of their best profit centers. It was doing well and if they could put the Post out of busines, which they did, they could dominate the market. But they got greedy. Thought they could send in their own people and compete with the New York Times. Now, lay-offs and outsourcing are becoming more and more common. Guess they accomplished one of their goals. The New York Times is in deep trouble too. Heard this morning their stock (NYT) has been reduced to “junk” status. And they still don’t get it. Go figure.

  12. wfish on October 30th, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    Final nail in the coffin: Chris Bell endorsement. “All Libs All The Time” should be their masthead.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom