Top
Comments
64 Responses to “Instant Karma’s Gonna Get You”
  1. Adee on January 10th, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    Ah, but this is an example of the fickle finger of fate or karma or just desserts.

  2. theTexican on January 10th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

    I say we start a pool on the nationality of the next supertanker to be hijacked.

    Since I started the pool, I get first pick: Kuwait

  3. Dov on January 10th, 2009 at 2:24 pm

    I don’t think it is wrong to laugh. They earned their way to Davey Jones’es locker.

    Just read the news on Yahoo and am still laughing

  4. Ken Kelley on January 10th, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    Such a shame, considering all that Rush did to help them get a better price for their hijacked booty. Sooooo, anybody want to go skindiving???????/
    – Ken

  5. Darren10 on January 10th, 2009 at 2:59 pm

    Ah, new Sea Kittens!!!

  6. Dov on January 10th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    It’s a shame that they didn’t know which serial numbers went down.

    Saudi to US “Would you please re-issue us serial numbers so and so”

  7. wagonburner on January 10th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    Their peg legs get stuck in the boat when it flipped? They ought to pay the next ones in nickels; they’ll sink faster.

  8. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

  9. malcolm on January 10th, 2009 at 5:25 pm

    What about this?……..Pay the pirates their ransom, let the hijackers get back in their small boats and then after they’re far enough away from the ship, hijack them back with a larger ship with some fire power waiting between them and shore.
    WOULD THAT WORK OR IS THAT PIE IN THE SKY?

  10. Desert_Pachyderm on January 10th, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    What you do is this:

    Agree to pay the ransom. Load up the bag with counterfit dollars and a few pounds of C4 with a remote detenator. And then “pay” them off.

    A little bar-b-qued Seakitten?

    Ronnie G

  11. sargevining on January 10th, 2009 at 6:02 pm

    sorry to bust your bubble guys

    Other reasons I question the veracity of the report: the only claim that they were drowned in “weather …so terrible that it blew the boat over” is from “an associate of the gang”.

    And this picture

  12. Darren10 on January 10th, 2009 at 6:48 pm

    headshaker;

    Loving and foregiving others does not exclude the demand for justice. In this case, poetic justice, which is often funny. Not to cheer on for the deaths of others; but to see that evil has perished by their own device. The pirates got their ransom which threw them off balance and nature took care of the rest. I desire eternal blessing to these pirates as much as anyone else.

  13. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    I haven’t seen anything in the Gospels about Jesus laughing at his enemies dying.

  14. Texian06 on January 10th, 2009 at 7:16 pm

    No. 13

    I am not Jesus, therefore I think it is a hoot!

    SOP where ranson is paid would be for an Apache helicopter to give them a short burst from a 20mm chain gun. Just a little boost into hell.

  15. sargevining on January 10th, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    Shakes;

    It’s only because Christians are cruel minded hypocrites.

    Nobody else would think its funny that a bunch of guys hijacked a ship got drowned because the tipped thier own boat over arguing over the ransom.

    Nobody but us Christians.

    You caught us.

    We’re so ashamed.

  16. Darren10 on January 10th, 2009 at 7:58 pm

    headshaker;

    I haven’t seen anything in the Gospels about Jesus laughing at his enemies dying.

    I haven’t seen in any of the gospels where Jesus laughed period. Let’s go Puritan!!!

  17. Katfish on January 10th, 2009 at 8:02 pm

    AccccccchhhhhhhhhhhhhMED! Why that bag of baksheesh ticking?”

  18. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 8:11 pm

    Blah blah blah. Where’s jimb to apologize for Hamous et al?

  19. hamous on January 10th, 2009 at 8:17 pm

    I guess Captain Sanctimonious missed the first four words of this post.

  20. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    I saw that. So you know it’s wrong and you do it anyway.

    Point proven.

    Thank you! OUT!

  21. hamous on January 10th, 2009 at 8:25 pm

    What point??? That I’m a sinner? That’s not exactly a news flash and you certainly didn’t prove it. You weren’t even the first to observe it today.

  22. sargevining on January 10th, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 8:21 pm I saw that. So you know it’s wrong and you do it anyway.

    Point proven.

    Thank you! OUT!

    Gonna have to explain it, now that you’ve proved it.

    Unles that your point is that you play “Holier Than Thou” better than any devout Christian Ive ever met.

    You’ve proved that one.

    A lot.

  23. Darren10 on January 10th, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    Should I close my eyes, click on headshakers site, and open them to see if he posted a sex-based thread after quoting srcipture and offering solomn prayer?

  24. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 8:43 pm

    #23 Darren

    I don’t post threads over there any longer. I have consiglieres :)

  25. jimb on January 10th, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    23 - you’d be right on in your assessment.

    By the way, Shakey, “apologies” from “the apologist”, but BITE ME.

  26. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 8:48 pm

    Jimb, do you think it’s OK to laugh at the deaths of human beings, albeit criminals? I don’t find it funny, I find it a tragic end to the lives of poor people who live in unbelievably horrific conditions and feel their only way out is to commit crime.

    But that’s just me, the bad Christian wannabe.

  27. jimb on January 10th, 2009 at 8:55 pm

    Shakey, in all honesty, it turns me completely off when you lecture others about such things. You come across as sanctimonious and holier-than-thou as the most puffed up Pharisee I’ve ever heard of.

    Just because you think the targets of your derision are Christian makes no difference. Nobody you have slammed today has ever claimed to be perfect.

    Poetic justice is just that. Maybe it isn’t right to find humor in it, but at the same time, nobody’s throwing a party and dancing around severed heads here either.

    I’ll offer you the same advice you’ve rightly offered me in the past: Lighten up.

    I’m not sure you have this emotional imperative to slam Christians for every imperfection you perceive…

  28. jimb on January 10th, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    Besides, how did you know these particular poor, victimized pirates chose their way out of desperation?

  29. sargevining on January 10th, 2009 at 8:56 pm

    Jimb, do you think it’s OK to laugh at the deaths of human beings, albeit criminals? I don’t find it funny, I find it a tragic end to the lives of poor people who live in unbelievably horrific conditions and feel their only way out is to commit crime.

    And decided to fix it by becoming bloodthirsty selfish pirates who’s greed was so immense that they tipped over thier own boat and drowned while fighting over the the 6 million dollars they’d just ripped off.

    No sympathy here.

    They created thier own Karma.

    And it was one He!! of a lot worse than Hammies.

  30. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    #27 jimb

    So it’s OK for Hamous and the other “usual suspects” to sit around and pass judgment on everyone else (you know, Liberals, Muslims, etc. etc. etc.)? But Christians are off-limits. Interesting™

    I hate to say it, but seems like a __________ __________.

    P.S. I don’t care what turns you on and off, that ain’t my job ;)

  31. jimb on January 10th, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    You don’t even see the difference between what you do and what they do, Shakey.

  32. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    #29 Sarge

    No argument with you on that; I just don’t find it “funny”. That’s all.

    Carry on. I’m OUT for the night.

    God Bless.

  33. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 8:59 pm

    #29 Sarge

    No argument with you on that; I just don’t find it “funny”. That’s all.

    Carry on. I’m OUT for the night.

    God Bless.

  34. jimb on January 10th, 2009 at 9:00 pm

    So no, it isn’t one of your vaunted “double standards”.

  35. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 9:01 pm

    #31 jimb

    It’s criticizing and pointing out hypocrisy against certain groups of people. No, I don’t see the difference.

    You’re inherently biased. End of discussion. Goodnight.

  36. hamous on January 10th, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    There’s certainly lots of judgment-passing going on but it ain’t from “the usual suspects”.

  37. sargevining on January 10th, 2009 at 9:06 pm

    Well;

    For the record, I wasn’t laughing at the greedy drowned pirates.

    I was lauging at shaey.

    How does he sit down with that stick so far up his——

  38. jimb on January 10th, 2009 at 9:11 pm

    I’m inherently biased how? Because only Christians are capable of being holier-than-thou? Or maybe I’m biased AGAINST you? Help me understand how the stone-throwing you are doing is any better than what you accuse others of.

  39. GoodJobTim on January 10th, 2009 at 9:20 pm

    Hey, this is like old times. I think I’m gonna tear up.

  40. jimb on January 10th, 2009 at 9:25 pm

    ROFL

  41. GoodJobTim on January 10th, 2009 at 9:33 pm

    Ok I just had to put on some Barry Manilow.

  42. sargevining on January 10th, 2009 at 9:37 pm

    So–

    In the movie, who would play the Lead Pirate?

    I’m thinking Ben Stiller here, with Jack Black as the guy he argues with, and Jim Carrey as the guy who grabs for the cash and tips the dinghy over.

  43. hamous on January 10th, 2009 at 9:47 pm

    #39 - ;-)

  44. sargevining on January 10th, 2009 at 9:50 pm

    I think the basic problem here is a broken Irony Meter and a Sanctimony Emitter working overtime.

  45. The Dude on January 10th, 2009 at 9:59 pm

    HA!!!

    I laugh at your feeble sanctimonious bloggings!

    With no apologies!

  46. The Dude on January 10th, 2009 at 10:01 pm

    I laugh at drowned pirates as well. Don’t want them to feel excluded.

  47. headshaker on January 10th, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    You’re drunk! Go sleep it off!

  48. hamous on January 10th, 2009 at 10:13 pm

    I say keep drinking before the Headshaker Temperance Union bans alcohol!

  49. fat albert on January 10th, 2009 at 10:44 pm

    We should stop laughing at the poor pirates……

    And start laughing at headshaker.

  50. texpat on January 10th, 2009 at 10:55 pm

    #49 fat albert

    I have been…for years.

  51. american woman on January 11th, 2009 at 6:58 am

    Wow y’all had some great lines last night. I am still chuckling.

  52. SeeVee on January 11th, 2009 at 9:43 am

    Ok, Shaker, lets talk about levels of “funny.”

    #4) Pirates get killed when they make their escape after violently hijacking a tanker and making off with the ranson.

    Funny, but there is funnier..

    #3) A bleeding heart liberal pantywaisted apologist for the pirates/common thief is killed by the **** in the commisson of his crime.

    Funny, but there is even funnier!

    #2) That same bleeding heart liberal pantywaisted apologist actualy survies the commision of the crime byt the pirate/common theif but his wife and kids do not and they suffer a brutal death leaving the bleeding heart liberal pantywaisted apologist to pick up the pieces and drive on.

    #1) Listen to the lifelong gnashing of teeth by the bleeding heart liberal pantywaisted apologist as he tries to reconsile his positions.

    Anyone feeling sorry for these idiots is a, well, idiot.

  53. SeeVee on January 11th, 2009 at 9:52 am

    David Numberman’s top five funny list:

    #5) Somali pirates/common theives die making their escape with the ranson after violently hijacking a tanker

    #4) A bleeding hear liberal pantywaisted apologist makes excuses for said pirates/common theifs and mournes their deaths.

    #3) That same bleeding hear liberal pantywaisted apologist get robbed by the prirates/common thief that he just felt sorry for.

    #2) That same bleeding hear liberal pantywaisted apologist get robbed, and just for good measure, KILLED TOO by the prirates/common thief that he just felt sorry for.

    and the number one funny…….

    #1) That same bleeding hear liberal pantywaisted apologist doesnt get robbed and killed but his family does! Hardy har har! And now said bleeding hear liberal pantywaisted apologist is left to gnash his teeth as he tries to justify his position.

    Anyone who doesnt think these idiots got what they deserved, is well, and idiot.

  54. Ken Kelley on January 11th, 2009 at 11:10 am

    to Headshaker (#8 and #26, etc):
    Returning to the party a bit late, it did provide me the benefit of seeing how things developed (or devolved).
    It seems to me that your basic premise is flawed. (And no, that isn’t a reference to the Bible verse, itself; don’t bother to go there.) The pirates (thieves) are already dead. My grasp on concepts spiritual is that the eternal fate of those souls is sealed, by their choices made while living. Perhaps your perspective is different. But it seems to me that prayers are better suited to the families, people, and/or culture from which these criminals came; in other words, those still living.
    I do recall multiple examples throughout the Bible which involved certain particularly evil people being struck dead, or being killed (executed) under specific guidelines. Indeed, in some cases, the armies of God’s people were directed to conduct what would now be termed genocide.
    Regardless, if a handful of pirates (thieves) did drown in a manner which is in some way related to their crimes (sins), then one might conclude that God could have chosen to rescue them but chose to do otherwise.
    In that aspect, the whole thing is hardly more than what is commonly seen as a “stupid criminal joke” because of some criminal’s lack of preparation and planning.
    Frankly, it seems to me that your overall attitude does come across as being rather sanctimonious, and dangerously close to some sort of moral equivalency for any person’s actions if some sort of sociological, cultural, or economic situation could be found to be a “justifiable” cause. That viewpoint leaves little room for personal responsibility.

    my 2¢,
    – Ken

  55. wagonburner on January 11th, 2009 at 12:57 pm

    The whole story looks like something that could be made into a parable, as a couple of people above have already said. Christ didn’t use humor in his parables as we all know. If the circumstances involved here were not so stupidly vaudevillian in nature, this would not seem as funny. As it is, you can almost imagine the pirates:

    Achmed: AArrgghhhh, let’s divide the booty! Mahmood, bring the treasure barrel.

    Mahmood: You’ll not be dividing anything. Last time you took half of my share.

    Ali: Yeah, what he said, nyuk nyuk nyuk!

    Achmed: Why, I oughta smack you, you knucklehead!

    Ali: Nyaaaaahhhhh, whoop whoop whoop!

    Achmed: Look over here.

    Mahmood: Where?

    Achmed: Right here numbskull! (poink - he pokes Mahmood in the eyes with the “split-finger” technique)

    Mahmood: Ooowwwww!

    Ali: (starts slapping his head and dancing) Whoa whooaaa-aaa-aaa. (boat tips over)

  56. hamous on January 11th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    WhyyyIiiiaughta!

  57. headshaker on January 11th, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    Putting aside the “WWJD” factor for a second, that’s pretty freakin’ funny wb.

  58. vlou on January 11th, 2009 at 5:02 pm

    I wonder if they will ever recover the funds from the sea.

  59. pimlico on January 11th, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    Headshaker/equaliser? thanks for the bit from the Sermon on the Mount. It’s a beautiful scripture.
    Did the money go too???

  60. pimlico on January 11th, 2009 at 5:30 pm

    The thing that got me from the Article, was the family whining about the naval patrols…….. They didn’t play fair!!

  61. hamous on January 11th, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    #11 Sarge - looks like the reports of a scam may have been greatly exaggerated:

    MOGADISHU, Somalia — The body of a Somali pirate who drowned just after receiving a huge ransom washed onshore with $153,000 in cash, a resident said Sunday, as the spokesman for another group of pirates promised to soon free a Ukrainian arms ship.

  62. wagonburner on January 11th, 2009 at 10:36 pm

    #61 hamous
    Do they know if it was Achmed, Mahmood, or Ali, or was it one of the others?

  63. Ken Kelley on January 12th, 2009 at 10:18 am

    #58 vlou: To that question, I believe I have the official response.

    There was no recovery effort. Even if there was, there was no money recovered. And if there were any money recovered, it certainly did not find its way into the private accounts of any individuals involved, of which there were none, of course.

    – Ken, ignoring the report of the $153K washed ashore, because this response is more fun!

  64. LTC on January 12th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    The body of a Somali pirate…washed ashore with $153,000 in cash…

    A relative of the drowned pirate…trying to dry out the recovered money.

    Three pirates managed to survive, but lost their share of the ransom

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7824353.stm

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

     Back to main page

Bottom